Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

ePoster Display

636P - A comparative analysis of prostate cancer short-term recurrence risk forecast performance between 8-gene signature and commercial panels

Date

16 Sep 2021

Session

ePoster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Jinan Guo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2021) 32 (suppl_5): S626-S677. 10.1016/annonc/annonc702

Authors

J. Guo1, T. Chen2, J. Miao3, H. Chen3, M. Huang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Urology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, 518020 - Shenzhen/CN
  • 2 The Medical Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai/CN
  • 3 Innovation Center,bioinformatics Department, 3D Medicines Inc., Shanghai/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 636P

Background

Despite early clinical stage prostate cancer (PCa) postoperative disease progresses slowly with a favorable survival profile, approximately 20% of patients occur biochemical recurrences even with negative surgical margins. Current clinical predictors of diagnosis have limitations to accurately establish recurrence and progression risk.

Methods

The expression data of 422 tumor and normal samples of PCa from TCGA was used to identify differentially expressed mRNAs of genes by Wilcoxon test. The mRNA expression data and clinical data in four public datasets (DFKZ2018, GSE70796, GSE107299, GSE54460) were used for external validation. The time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival(OS) predictions of eight gene signature was compared with three commercial gene expression panels (OncotypeDx, Decipher and Prolaris). Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was used to further study the underlying molecular mechanisms.

Results

An 8-gene prognosis signature model was established for predicting PCa prognosis. Patients was characterized with high-risk and low-risk sets using the model, where prognosis was significantly worse in the high-risk group across cohorts (P < 0.05). Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that this signature was an independent prognostic factor of PCa survival. Nomogram including the prognostic signature was constructed and showed better predictive performance in short year survival. In TCGA whole cohort, the eight-gene signature had a comparable or superior performance to that of the three commercial panels, whose AUCs for 1-, 2-, and 3-year OS predictions for the risk scores were 0.737, 0.760, and 0.737, respectively. In the subgroup analysis of clinical low-risk group (PSA < 10 ng/ml), the relapse-free survival (RFS) of low-risk group was still longer than high-risk group (P = 0.00024). GSEA revealed enrichment of immunoglobulin complex related terms and B cell mediated immunity in the low-risk group.

Conclusions

The 8-gene signature was not inferior to other commercial panels for predicting short-term recurrence risk in PCa, which might provide meaningful information to therapeutic customization.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

T. Chen, J. Miao, H. Chen, M. Huang: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Member: 3D Medicines Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.