Abstract 1969
Background
In early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the anatomical resection with lymph node dissection is a standard procedure as a curative intent while wedge resection is considered as a passive treatment. However, optimal treatment strategy for elderly ( > = 80 y.o.) patients remains controversial. We attempted to disclose the role of wedge resection without lymph node dissection as a treatment option in octogenarians or older.
Methods
Among 671 patients with clinical stage IA NSCLC with whole tumor size is 2 cm or less and consolidation to tumor ratio is more than 0.5 underwent R0 resection in three institutions between 2010 and 2015, 55 octogenarians or older were investigated about clinicopathological findings and prognosis based on surgical procedures and lymph node dissection status.
Results
The median follow-up time was 35 months. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate for octogenarians or older was 83.8% (95% confidential interval (CI): 69.7-91.7%). No significant differences for OS were detected among three surgical procedures (3-year OS rate: wedge resection: 88.5% (95%CI: 68.4-96.1%), segmentectomy: 83.3% (95%CI: 27.3-97.5%) , and lobectomy: 78.9% (95%CI: 53.0-91.6%), P = 0.72) or lymph node dissection status (3-year OS rate: ND0: 88.9% (95%CI: 69.4-96.3%) and ND1 or 2: 77.0% (95%CI: 50.8-90.4%), P = 0.95). The multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that male gender (Hazard ratio (HR): 4.7 (1.1-20.2), P = 0.039) and larger solid tumor size (HR: 5.8 (1.1-29.9), P = 0.035) were independent poor prognostic factors whereas surgical procedure (wedge resection vs. segmentectomy or lobectomy) (HR: 0.50 (0.15-1.7), P = 0.27) was not. In another model, lymph node dissection status (ND0 vs. ND1 or 2) (HR: 0.51 (0.15-1.8), P = 0.28) was not found to be a prognostic factor.
Conclusions
In octogenarians or older with early stage NSCLC, wedge resection without lymph node dissection might be an alternative option to lobectomy or segmentectomy with lymph node dissection.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract