Abstract 3799
Background
Colorectal carcinoma 5-year survival ranges from 90% in patients with localized disease to 15% for those with distant metastasis. Recent research has suggested that hypermutation may predict response to immunotherapy in these tumors, but routine tests for microsatellite (MS) instability miss tumours which acquire hypermutation through other mechanisms. Tumour mutational burden (TMB) measured by next-generation sequencing has been proposed to overcome this limitation.
Methods
A commercially available next-generation sequencing panel targeting 409 cancer-relevant genes was validated for TMB measurement using 12 MS stable and 14 MS instable metastatic colorectal carcinomas, defined by routine testing of MS loci. The same panel was applied to 53 untested colorectal carcinomas with matched synchronous metastases, collected across 10 years to determine both their TMB and presence of KRAS/BRAF mutations.
Results
All samples could be sequenced at a mean coverage depth of 766x and uniformity of 97%. Mean TMB (mutations/megabase) was 8.84 for MS stable vs. 33.36 for MS instable cases in the assay validation cohort. A cut-off value of 15.56 reached 100% sensitivity (95% CI 77-100%) and 100% specificity (95% CI 73-100%). Analysis of the 10 years cohort showed KRAS mutation in 25 cases and BRAF mutation in 4; automated TMB analysis was feasible for samples collected within 7 years (n = 16), while in older specimens DNA deamination caused artefactual calls. 14 cases showed a low TMB in both primary and metastasis, one MS instable case showed high TMB in both primary and metastasis, and one MS stable case showed low TMB (11.61) in the primary and a higher TMB (21.37) in the metastasis. The mutational signature of the metastatic sample showed C>A transversions (11%), missing in the primary tumour, suggesting an additional mutational mechanism.
Conclusions
Gene panel-based TMB analysis can be performed on routine histology samples to detect both hypermutation and cancer relevant somatic mutations. Analysis of older samples may lead to deamination artifacts, which can however be revealed by mutational signature analysis.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Aldo Scarpa (ARC-NET Cancer Research Centre).
Funding
Associazione Italiana Ricerca Cancro [AIRC grant n. 12182].
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1885 - Factors associated with disease progression in patients treated with trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: an open label, non randomized study
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5259 - Integrative RNAseq and Target panel sequencing reveals common and distinct innate and adaptive resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibitors
Presenter: Phil Cheng
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5619 - Effective treatment with T-VEC monotherapy in Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a Melanoma of the Head & Neck Region
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5666 - Re-introduction of T-VEC Monotherapy in Recurrent Stage IIIB/C-IVM1a melanoma is effective
Presenter: Viola Franke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4117 - Efficacy of talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC) in melanoma patients (pts) with locoregional (LR) recurrence, including in-transit metastases (ITM): subgroup analysis of the phase 3 OPTiM study
Presenter: Mark Middleton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5303 - Real Life Use of Talimogene Laherparepvec in Melanoma in Centers in Austria and Switzeland
Presenter: Christoph Hoeller
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4130 - Outcomes of advanced melanoma patients who discontinued pembrolizumab (pembro) after complete response (CR) in the French early access program (EAP)
Presenter: Philippe Saiag
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2050 - Outcome of patients with elevated LDH treated with first-line targeted therapy (TT) or PD-1 based immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)
Presenter: Sarah Knispel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1618 - Comparative-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab vs. Nivolumab for Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Presenter: Justin Moser
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3556 - Long-term efficacy of combination nivolumab and ipilimumab for first-line treatment of advanced melanoma: a network meta-analysis
Presenter: Peter Mohr
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract