Abstract 6062
Background
A standardized evaluation approach in oncology is essential to optimize treatment and management of patients. In particular, a medical software designed to provide standard metrics and reports may help the communication among health care professionals, facilitating the decision process. To this aim, a large survey study was conducted across the United Kingdom (UK), Spain (ES) and Italy (IT) exploring existing unmet needs and questioning the way oncological data is tracked in daily routine practice with the aim of offering some ideas for improvement.
Methods
Physicians were enrolled by an independent Market Research Company according to diiferent inclusion criteria: a) 2-35 years in practice; b) ≥50% of practice time in direct patient care; c) involvement in making treatment decisions ; d) involvement in ordering and reviewing tumour assessment reports; e) to be an investigator or author of an oncology clinical trial in the past 5 years.The study was conducted in November-December, 2018.
Results
A total number of 270 physicians (medical oncologists: n = 180, radio-oncologists: n = 90) participated (UK/100, ES/95, IT/75). The vast majority of physicians use Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) criteria in their daily practice (86%). Guidelines for response criteria for use in trials testing immunotherapeutics (iRECIST) and modified RECIST (mRECIST) are also used by between third and a quarter of physicians. Of note, almost half of the physicians indicated that there is a low level of data management in oncology and 2 out of 3 agree that this negatively impacts therapeutic decisions. Over a third of ES physicians believe that there is a low level of data management in oncology and a similar proportion in IT and ES report that it is impacting therapeutic decision making.
Conclusions
Only a third of physicians view their current reporting systems as adequate. All participants agree that any reporting system is in need of a common shared template for radiologists and oncologists. Thus, physicians identify a lack of consistency in diagnostic assessments and delays in receiving the reports as key unmet needs in tumor reporting systems –indicating the need for a streamlined system.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Wehealth Digital Medicine.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3611 - Phase II trial of SM 88 in Non-Metastatic Biochemical Recurrent Prostate Cancer.
Presenter: Benjamin Gartrell
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2492 - A phase 1 study of Ad5 PSA/MUC-1/Brachyury Vaccine in Patients with Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Marijo Bilusic
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3142 - Multicenter Phase I Trial of a DNA Vaccine Encoding the Androgen Receptor Ligand Binding Domain (pTVG-AR, MVI-118) in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer
Presenter: Douglas McNeel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4327 - Impact of germline mutations in Homologous Recombination (HR) genes on the response to Radium-223 for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Elena Castro
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3600 - Serum biomarkers of bone metabolism in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) treated with Radium-223 (Ra223): Results from a prospective multicentre study
Presenter: Nuria Romero Laorden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3742 - Prognostic value of tumor suppression genes (TP53, PTEN, Rb) in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Miguel Gonzalez Velez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2643 - Germline sequencing of advanced prostate cancer patients in the BARCODE2 trial
Presenter: Sarah Benafif
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4349 - Impact of treatment sequence in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): data from the prospective PROREPAIR-B study.
Presenter: Carlo Cattrini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3301 - Implications of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in Androgen Related-Genes in Outcome of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients treated with Abiraterone (Abi) and Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Isabel Aragon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2275 - Activating mutations in AKT1/PIK3CA are associated with poor clinical outcomes in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Simon Fu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract