Abstract 2579
Background
NSR-SCC is a rare subset of bladder tumors distinct from urothelial carcinoma (UC). Most studies that have assessed molecular biomarkers in bladder cancer have been limited to UC. We aim to characterize the genomic profile of NSR-SCC and to correlate genomic alterations with survival outcomes.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of NSR-SCC patients (pts) at Princess Margaret Cancer Centre. Patient demographics, risk factors, disease characteristics, treatment modalities, and survival outcomes were collected for eligible pts. Genomic DNA and complementary DNA were analyzed using Oncomine® V3 assay, a targeted NGS platform. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier (log-rank). Uni- (UVA) and multi-variate (MVA) analysis (Cox-regression) was used to evaluate the impact of patient and genomic characteristics on OS.
Results
We identified 11 pts with NSR-SCC from 2002-2017, with median age 71 years (range 46-86) and 7 were male. Nine pts had muscle invasive, 1 superficial stage and 1 distant metastasis. Nine pts had radical cystectomy and LN dissection. Eight pts had pT3 or pT4 with N0 and 6 were grade 2. Median OS was 12.5 months (95 % CI 7.7- 17.2 months). Common point mutations were identified in TERT (73%), TP53 (73%), PIK3CA (27%), CREBBP (18%), FBXW7 (18%), and PTEN (18%). Amplifications were identified in EGFR (18%), FGF3 (18%), CCND1 (18%), and FGF19 (18%). Additional mutations were detected at a frequency <10%. On UVA, only bladder irritants (e.g. prior radiation, urinary catheter, infection) were associated with improved OS (HR = 0.091; p = 0.031). A limited MVA didn’t identify any significant prognostic genomic abnormalities: TP53 (HR = 2.2; 95%CI: 0.3-17; p = 0.425), TERT (HR = 1.45; 95%CI: 0.2-10.2; p = 0.70) and PIK3CA (HR = 0.46; 95%CI: 0.1- 2.0; p = 0.31).
Conclusions
In this NSR-SCC series, we identified a number of actionable genomic alterations that may be targeted with drugs. No mutation was able to define different prognostic groups. Many of these aberrations were seen in UC. Biomarker driven studies in UC should consider enrollment of NSR-SCC pts who harbor these putative mutations.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Aaron Hansen.
Funding
Astellas.
Disclosure
A.G. Sacher: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Genentech-Roche. G. Kulkarni: Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ferring; Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi. A. Zlotta: Advisory / Consultancy: Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Ferring; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen. A.R. Hansen: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): GSK; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Bristol-Myers; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Boston Biomedical; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4370 - Continental differences in pathologic response with neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) plus nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with macroscopic stage III melanoma in the phase 2 OpACIN-neo trial.
Presenter: Irene Reijers
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3230 - Comparable responses of melanoma at primary site and synchronous lymph node metastases upon neoadjuvant ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO)
Presenter: Judith Versluis
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3171 - Adjuvant Therapies for Stage III Melanoma: Benchmarks for Bringing Clinical Trials to Clinical Practice
Presenter: Tina HIEKEN
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3493 - Mixture-cure modeling for resected stage III/IV melanoma in the phase 3 CheckMate 238 trial
Presenter: Jeffrey Weber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3036 - An open-label, non-randomized, phase IIIb study of trametinib in combination with dabrafenib for patients with unresectable advanced BRAFV600-mutant melanoma: a subgroup analysis of patients with brain metastasis
Presenter: Caroline Dutriaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2233 - Adverse event (AE) kinetics in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib + trametinib (D + T) in the metastatic and adjuvant setting
Presenter: Jean Jacques Grob
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2435 - A Single Arm, Open Label, Phase II, Multicenter Study to Assess the Detection of the BRAF V600 Mutation on cfDNA from Plasma in Patients with Advanced Melanoma
Presenter: Piotr Rutkowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1766 - Efficacy and Safety of Dabrafenib and Trametinib in Patients with Metastatic BRAFV600 Mutation-positive Melanoma in the Real-World Setting – Interim results of the non-interventional COMBI-r study
Presenter: Carola Berking
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2131 - Trial update: A randomized Phase Ib/II study of the selective small molecule Axl inhibitor Bemcentinib (BGB324) in combination with either dabrafenib/trametinib (D/T) or pembrolizumab in patients with metastatic melanoma
Presenter: Oddbjørn Straume
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4074 - Analysis of pyrexia in patients (pts) treated with dabrafenib (D) and/or trametinib (T) across clinical trials
Presenter: Caroline Robert
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract