Abstract 4382
Background
Implementing screening programs for risk populations can reduce lung cancer mortality by detecting the disease at early stages, when surgical intervention or chemotherapy treatment can be conducted with best prognosis. Screening protocols based on Low-Dose CT presents a series of drawbacks and needs complementary methods for improving sensitivity and specificity in the screening procedure. Thermal Liquid Biopsy (TLB) is as a complementary technique that, combined with imaging techniques, may improve the efficacy of the screening method.
Methods
Blood samples from Healthy Controls (HC) and Lung Cancer Patients (LCP) were analyzed with a high sensitivity microcalorimeter VP-DSC (MicroCal – Malvern Panalytical). The data were processed in Origin 7.0 software. The plasma thermograms were analyzed through a multiparametric method developed by our research group. Statistical models allowed classifying the subjects according their serum thermograms.
Results
115 LCP subjects (average age 64.6±8.7, 83.0% men) with broad stage distribution (II: 5%, III: 26%; IV: 69%), smoking status (64% smoking, 7% non-smoking), histology distribution (37% adenocarcinoma, 29% squamous, 30% small cell) were compared to 119 HC subjects homogeneously distributed from a blood bank. TLB parameters obtained showed statistical differences between HC and LCP groups. Different statistical models were applied in order to establish the optimal TLB output, which is able to classify subjects according to their TLB thermogram: 92% success rate, 90% specificity, and 94% sensitivity (i.e., diagnostic odds ratio of 140).
Conclusions
High positive association between clinical groups and TLB multiparametric model offers advantages over current diagnosis techniques (LDCT imaging), providing a powerful diagnostic approach with a minimally-invasive, low-risk, low-cost clinical test for LCP. Future promising applications, such as screening programs, could be developed from TLB.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Instituto Carlos III (Spain).
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract