Abstract 888
Background
Multiple national1 and international2 guidelines recommend that genetic testing is provided by genetic experts in the context of genetic counselling. However, there has been little research performed assessing the utility of genetic counselling. This study was performed to determine the value of genetic counselling for individuals undergoing breast cancer genetic testing.
Methods
GeneHealth UK clinical records for patients seen between the 1st January 2018 and 30th June 2018 for breast cancer were reviewed to determine what was discussed during the consultations. Data was collated in four categories: a) appropriateness of genetic testing, b) psychological support, c) implications for relatives d) management guidance.
Results
Of a total of 130 patients, 74% (96) had breast cancer, and 26% (34) had a family history. 10% of tested patients had a pathogenic genetic variant. 98% of patients had at least one discussion in the assessed areas; 16% had two, 21% had three and 52% had four or more. Genetic counselling helped 15% of patients decide not to proceed with genetic testing: either because a relative would be more appropriate to test (5%), the patient had a low risk of a BRCA mutation (3%) or for psychological reasons (7%). Psychological support was provided to 15% of patients including the provision of support resources in 12% and referral for counselling in 2% of cases. Genetic counsellors assess the whole family and were therefore able to provide screening recommendations for relatives in 62% of cases and assess risk of other familial conditions in 2% of families. Of importance external referrals were made in 6% of patients.
Conclusions
Genetic counselling provides significant psychosocial and practical benefits in the provision of breast cancer genetics: including advice for the whole family, ensuring genetic testing is appropriate and referral to appropriate external healthcare agencies. 1 NICE Guidance 2 NCCN Guidelines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Kiesel: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Genehealth UK. G. Wishart: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Check4Cancer.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract