Abstract 888
Background
Multiple national1 and international2 guidelines recommend that genetic testing is provided by genetic experts in the context of genetic counselling. However, there has been little research performed assessing the utility of genetic counselling. This study was performed to determine the value of genetic counselling for individuals undergoing breast cancer genetic testing.
Methods
GeneHealth UK clinical records for patients seen between the 1st January 2018 and 30th June 2018 for breast cancer were reviewed to determine what was discussed during the consultations. Data was collated in four categories: a) appropriateness of genetic testing, b) psychological support, c) implications for relatives d) management guidance.
Results
Of a total of 130 patients, 74% (96) had breast cancer, and 26% (34) had a family history. 10% of tested patients had a pathogenic genetic variant. 98% of patients had at least one discussion in the assessed areas; 16% had two, 21% had three and 52% had four or more. Genetic counselling helped 15% of patients decide not to proceed with genetic testing: either because a relative would be more appropriate to test (5%), the patient had a low risk of a BRCA mutation (3%) or for psychological reasons (7%). Psychological support was provided to 15% of patients including the provision of support resources in 12% and referral for counselling in 2% of cases. Genetic counsellors assess the whole family and were therefore able to provide screening recommendations for relatives in 62% of cases and assess risk of other familial conditions in 2% of families. Of importance external referrals were made in 6% of patients.
Conclusions
Genetic counselling provides significant psychosocial and practical benefits in the provision of breast cancer genetics: including advice for the whole family, ensuring genetic testing is appropriate and referral to appropriate external healthcare agencies. 1 NICE Guidance 2 NCCN Guidelines.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
V. Kiesel: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Genehealth UK. G. Wishart: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Check4Cancer.
Resources from the same session
2860 - Prognostic value of metabolic response assessed by 18FDG-PET after induction chemotherapy and after chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in localized esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients (pts) receiving definite CRT (dCRT)
Presenter: Yeonghak Bang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3881 - Comprehensive genomic profiling of early-stage esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
Presenter: Jing Zuo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3944 - A novel nomogram and risk classification system predicting radiation pneumonitis in patients with esophageal cancer receiving radiotherapy
Presenter: Lu Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1956 - Drinking alcohol, smoking, multiple dysplastic lesions and the risk of field cancerization of squamous cell carcinoma in the esophagus and head and neck region
Presenter: Chikatoshi Katada
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2144 - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy can eliminate the negative impact of postoperative infectious complications on recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer
Presenter: Kazuki Kano
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2403 - Comparison of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CF) versus definitive CRT with carboplatin and paclitaxel (CP) in esophageal cancer
Presenter: Marcelle Cesca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3247 - Paclitaxel in Combination with Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil(TPF) Induction Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Borderline-resectable Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: A Phase II Clinical Trial
Presenter: Yuhong Li
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4293 - Prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma based on local immunity evaluation
Presenter: Elena Zlatnik
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5419 - Impact of Sarcopenia and adiposity in survival of metastatic esophageal cancer (MEC)
Presenter: Aline Fares
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2083 - PALAESTRA - A phase II trial with short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy as palliative treatment in esophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: David Borg
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract