Abstract 2129
Background
We present a pharmacodynamic model that describes the tumor volume evolution during and after treatment with radiation and in combination with a radiosensitizing agent. A key contribution is the inclusion of a long-term radiation effect, which allows the model to describe distinct tumor behaviors including tumor eradication and tumor regrowth with different growth rates. Additionally, we introduce the concept of TSE (Tumor Static Exposure), the exposures of one or multiple compounds that result in tumor stasis and provide an example of its utility for optimizing drug combinations in oncology.
Methods
The model was challenged with data from four treatment groups (Vehicle, radiation, radiation + radiosensitizer 25 or 100 mg/kg) in xenograft study using a clinically-relevant administration schedule (6 weeks treatment, 5 days on/2 days off) and a mixed-effects approach was used for model-fitting. The model incorporated a permanent inhibition of the natural growth rate. This step was required to capture the complete tumor eradication and the observed tumor regrowth with different rates with animals having slower regrowth compared to control animals. The presence of a radiosensitizer will lead to the same tumor evolution as if a higher dose of radiation had been administered. The model was applied to predict exposure combinations that result in tumor eradication using the TSE.
Results
The developed model captured experimental data from all treatment groups adequately, with the parameter estimates taking biologically reasonable values. Model simulation showed that tumor eradication is observed at total radiation dose of 110 Gy, which is reduced to 80 or 30 Gy with co-administration of 25 or 100 mg/kg of a radiosensitizer.
Conclusions
The new model can describe different tumor dynamics including tumor eradication and tumor regrowth with different rates. The proposed model can be expanded for radiation in combination with chemical interventions or immunotherapy. The model and TSE can be applied to generate treatment predictions for different dosing schedules or determining drug synergies. The translational utility of the TSE concept is currently under investigation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Funding
Tim Cardilin was supported by an education Grant from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. This work was also partially funded by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (Grant no. AM13-0046).
Disclosure
S. El Bawab: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. A. Zimmermann: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. F. Lignet: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1715 - National Small Cell Bladder Cancer Audit: Results from 26 UK institutions
Presenter: Caroline Chau
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract