Abstract 2129
Background
We present a pharmacodynamic model that describes the tumor volume evolution during and after treatment with radiation and in combination with a radiosensitizing agent. A key contribution is the inclusion of a long-term radiation effect, which allows the model to describe distinct tumor behaviors including tumor eradication and tumor regrowth with different growth rates. Additionally, we introduce the concept of TSE (Tumor Static Exposure), the exposures of one or multiple compounds that result in tumor stasis and provide an example of its utility for optimizing drug combinations in oncology.
Methods
The model was challenged with data from four treatment groups (Vehicle, radiation, radiation + radiosensitizer 25 or 100 mg/kg) in xenograft study using a clinically-relevant administration schedule (6 weeks treatment, 5 days on/2 days off) and a mixed-effects approach was used for model-fitting. The model incorporated a permanent inhibition of the natural growth rate. This step was required to capture the complete tumor eradication and the observed tumor regrowth with different rates with animals having slower regrowth compared to control animals. The presence of a radiosensitizer will lead to the same tumor evolution as if a higher dose of radiation had been administered. The model was applied to predict exposure combinations that result in tumor eradication using the TSE.
Results
The developed model captured experimental data from all treatment groups adequately, with the parameter estimates taking biologically reasonable values. Model simulation showed that tumor eradication is observed at total radiation dose of 110 Gy, which is reduced to 80 or 30 Gy with co-administration of 25 or 100 mg/kg of a radiosensitizer.
Conclusions
The new model can describe different tumor dynamics including tumor eradication and tumor regrowth with different rates. The proposed model can be expanded for radiation in combination with chemical interventions or immunotherapy. The model and TSE can be applied to generate treatment predictions for different dosing schedules or determining drug synergies. The translational utility of the TSE concept is currently under investigation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Funding
Tim Cardilin was supported by an education Grant from Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany. This work was also partially funded by the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (Grant no. AM13-0046).
Disclosure
S. El Bawab: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. A. Zimmermann: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. F. Lignet: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract