Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3252 - Genes involved in DNA replication, chromatin remodeling and cell cycle as potential biomarkers for therapy outcome to immune therapy in patients with metastatic cutaneous malignant melanoma
Presenter: Fernanda Costa Svedman
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5545 - Phase Ib/II Study (SENSITIZE) assessing safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and clinical outcome of domatinostat in combination with pembrolizumab in patients with advanced melanoma refractory/non-responding to prior checkpoint inhibitor therapy
Presenter: Jessica Hassel
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5213 - Genomic landscape of primary malignant melanoma of esophagus
Presenter: Jie Dai
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2716 - A phase III, randomised, double-blind study of adjuvant cemiplimab versus placebo post-surgery and radiation in patients with high-risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC)
Presenter: Danny Rischin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3550 - ILLUMINATE 301: A randomized phase 3 study of tilsotolimod in combination with ipilimumab compared with ipilimumab alone in patients with advanced melanoma following progression on or after anti-PD-1 therapy
Presenter: Marcus Butler
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1645 - PRIME002 - Early phase II study of Azacitidine and Carboplatin priming for Avelumab in patients with advanced melanoma who are resistant to immunotherapy
Presenter: Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4440 - Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Lenvatinib (len) for First-Line Treatment of patients (pts) With Advanced Melanoma: Phase 3 LEAP-003 Study
Presenter: Alexander Eggermont
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3454 - Proof of concept study with the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with resistant BRAFV600 mutated advanced melanoma
Presenter: Sanne Huijberts
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1832 - A phase Ia/Ib clinical study to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary anti-tumor activity of FCN-159 in patients with advanced melanoma harboring NRAS-aberrant (Ia) and NRAS-mutation (Ib).
Presenter: Lu Si
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3996 - A Phase I Clinical Trial Investigating the Therapeutic Cancer Vaccine UV1 in Combination with Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment of Patients with Malignant Melanoma
Presenter: Sanjiv Agarwala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract