Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2743 - The Impact of Targeted Therapies and Immunotherapy in Melanoma Brain Metastases: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Presenter: Mario Mandala
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5479 - Intracranial Anti-Tumor Activity in Melanoma Brain Metastases with Encorafenib Plus Binimetinib: A Multicenter, Retrospective Analysis
Presenter: Jose Lutzky
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3560 - Outcomes of Patients with Melanoma Brain Metastases (MBM) Treated with Standard of Care Therapy After Being Excluded from MBM-Specific Clinical Trials
Presenter: Kourtney Holbrook
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3175 - The analysis of current treatment outcomes in melanoma patients with brain metastases
Presenter: Joanna Placzke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4550 - A multivariate model to define prognostic groups among patients with melanoma brain metastases: a 10-year retrospective cohort study
Presenter: Giacomo Pelizzari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4191 - The immune landscape of melanoma significantly influences survival in patients with highly mutated tumors.
Presenter: Robert Ferguson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1625 - Final Results from Phase II of Combination with Canerpaturev (formerly HF10), an Oncolytic Viral Immunotherapy, and Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma in 2nd-or later line treatment
Presenter: Kenji Yokota
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5346 - Evaluating polygenic risk score prediction model for melanoma prognosis
Presenter: Miriam Potrony
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5477 - Impact of sarcopenia in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy
Presenter: Maria Grazia Vitale
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3469 - Ancillary evaluation of systemic immune antitumor response (SIAR) and tumor growth rate (TGR) of patients (pts) with metastatic melanoma (MM) treated with radiotherapy (RT) combined with ipilimumab (ipi) in the phase 1 study Mel-Ipi-Rx.
Presenter: Celine Boutros
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract