Abstract 4836
Background
Lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations tend to respond poorly to IO, but this is not true for all activating mutation driven lung cancers. Recent data show that patients with BRAF mutations tend to respond better to IO. Our study estimated the tumor neoantigen burden in these tumors, and the likelihood of their presentation to cytotoxic T cells by estimating their binding affinity to major histocompatibility complex (MHC).
Methods
Whole exome data for 68 patients with EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinoma and 33 with BRAF mutations were extracted from the Cancer Genome Atlas. MAFTOOLs was used to determine the tumor mutational load. Nonamers were estimated by simulating possible nonamer neoantigens from MAF files. The neoantigen (MT) and wildtype (WT) binding affinities to MHC-I were calculated using the NetMHC 4.0 server. The differential binding affinity of the neoantigens in comparison to wildtype was calculated as mean differential agretopicity index (DAI) = WT - MT. Patient survival was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Results
Patients with mutated BRAF had higher median mutational burden (445, range 165-776) than those with EGFR mutations (90.5, range 60.5-219.5, p = 0.001). The median number of simulated neoantigens was higher in the BRAF (9536.5, range 3839.5-14626.0) vs the EGFR group (1895.5, range 1148.5-4766.5, p < 0.001). Mean DAI for BRAF and EGFR patients were 1046 and 1033, respectively, p = 0.86. In the BRAF mutant group, patients with DAI < 1,000 had significantly better 5-year survival (80% vs 40%, p = 0.022) compared to patients with DAI > 1,000. No such survival benefit was identified in the EGFR mutant group (56% vs 58%, p = 0.81).
Conclusions
BRAF mutant lung cancers are characterized by higher neoantigen burden, but their neoantigen differential binding affinity to MHC-I complex was not different from EGFR mutant lung cancers. Our analysis suggests that the improved response to IO in the BRAF mutant population is due to increased quantity in neoantigen burden and not a qualitative difference in MHC-I binding. Further, DAI had a prognostic impact in the BRAF population suggesting that it may be a measure of tumor neoantigen immunogenicity.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Subramanian: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Paradigm; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Lilly; Research grant / Funding (institution): Biocept. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3524 - Cabazitaxel For Octogenarian Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (MCRPC).
Presenter: Paolo Tralongo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5637 - External Validation of a Prognostic Score in First-Line Metastastic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: David Lorente
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3228 - Treatment outcomes of 3rd treatment in a real-world metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) population: results from the Dutch CAPRI-registry
Presenter: Jessica Notohardjo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4695 - Pelvic lymph node dissection and its extent on survival benefit in prostate cancer patients with a risk of lymph node invasion>5%: a propensity score matching analysis from SEER database
Presenter: Junru Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4438 - Multi-institutional evaluation of therapeutic management for oligometastatic cancer prostate recurrence with choline-PET/CT
Presenter: Morgane Guibert-broudic
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4574 - Safety of new androgen receptor inhibitors (ARi) in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC): a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT)
Presenter: Amelia Altavilla
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3816 - Real-world use of radium-223 for treatment of metastatic castration resistant-prostate cancer (mCRPC): results from the Dutch CAPRI registry
Presenter: Malou Kuppen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5180 - A phase 2a study of radium-223 dichloride (Ra-223) alone or in combination with abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Daniel Petrylak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1067 - Adding ADT to PSMA-PET/CT-guided SBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer improves distant progression-free survival
Presenter: Carole Mercier
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5529 - Safety and efficacy of Ac-225-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after failure of Lu-177-PSMA
Presenter: Robert Tauber
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract