Abstract 3506
Background
The diffusion of next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based tests for comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP), the development of new drugs matching specific genetic alterations, and the recent “agnostic approval” processes of anti-cancer agents represent an important innovation that favors the development of Precision Oncology. This “mutational model” supports and integrates the traditional approach to cancer therapy based on histology. Nevertheless, an uncontrolled use of CGP tests and of mutation-driven drugs can compromise their appropriateness, and put the sustainability of the health system at risk.
Methods
A group of experts in pathology, molecular biology, medical oncology, organization of health systems and health economics has developed an organizational model for precision oncology based on multidisciplinarity, on the careful selection of patients to be submitted to CGP tests and on access to off-label drugs in the context of a regulatory framework.
Results
A network of Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) accredited by the Italian Drug Agency (AIFA) according to transparent criteria with regard to composition, activities, traceability, and processing of data can represent the very new tool for managing the mutational model in clinical practice. The multidisciplinary MTBs meet regularly to select patients to be analyzed with CGP tests in order to ensure the appropriateness of the test. The MTBs also discuss therapeutic options on information deriving from NGS analyses. When no clinical trials matching the genetic alterations are available and an off-label drug is recommended, this therapy will be authorized by the Italian Drug Agency and data on the outcome of the patients will be stored in a national registry.
Conclusions
The increasing availability of CGP tests and of possibly active targeted-based agents represents an important opportunity of cancer patients to access to new drugs. The proposed model will allow access of Italian patients to possibly active treatments and at the same time will contribute to ensure the sustainability of this new approach and to increase the knowledge on the activity of target-based agents in specific subgroups of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Fondazione Ricerca&Salute.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract