Abstract 2513
Background
We investigated whether Imunoscore performed on localized or locally advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) tumor samples could predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcome.
Methods
This retrospective ongoing study evaluated the Immunoscore in 150 patients with UC (140 UC of the bladder, 10 UC of the upper tract) from 6 centers (Greece and France). All patients underwent neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. Pre-treatment tumor samples (trans-urethral resection or upper tract biopsy) were immunostained for CD3+ and CD8+ T cells and quantified by digital pathology to determine the Immunoscore. The consensus Immunoscore was applied to tumors with invasive margin and an Immunoscore adapted to samples quantified when no invasion was identified on the specimen. Results were correlated with response to neoadjuvant treatment and time to recurrence (TTR).
Results
Immunoscore Low, Intermediate and High were respectively observed in 40, 43 and 17% of the cohort. Densities of CD3 and CD8 in the center and invasive margin were not significantly different according to clinical parameters such as T-stage, N-stage, age, gender, tumor differentiation (with or without variant), and localization (upper tract versus bladder). Immunoscore was positively and significantly correlated with TTR. High, intermediate and low Immunoscore patients had a median TTR of 83, 34 and 27 months, respectively (P < 0,05). In multivariate analysis, Immunoscore remains a significant independent parameter at presentation associated with TTR (High vs Low: P < 0.05). Immunoscore was positively and significantly correlated with pathologic complete response (pCR) (P < 0.001). Low Immunoscore was observed in 69% of patients with no pCR, and in only 20% of patients with pCR. In contrast, high Immunoscore was observed in only 7% of patients with no pCR, whereas 40% of these patients had a pCR.
Conclusions
The results of this ongoing study show a significant prognostic and potentially predictive role of Immunoscore in UC patients with important therapeutic implications. These preliminary results will be completed as samples are being analyzed before ESMO 2019 annual meeting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
FONCER.
Disclosure
C. Thibault: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen-Cilag; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi Pasteur; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca/Medimmune; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche/Genentech. F. Hermitte: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: HalioDx. A. Bamias: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Ipsen; Research grant / Funding (self): Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas. J. Galon: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: HalioDx; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Gilead; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Io Biotech; Advisory / Consultancy: Illumina; Advisory / Consultancy: Northwest Biotherapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Actelion; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Perkin Elmer; Research grant / Funding (institution): MedImmune; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (institution): Imcheck; Licensing / Royalties: INSERM. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4096 - Patient experience and use of an intervention combining nurse-led telephone and technologies for the monitoring of oral cancer medication
Presenter: Marie Ferrua
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6042 - Harnessing nurse leadership to implement a project for electronic scheduling of chemotherapy
Presenter: Emma Masters
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3123 - Turkish Cancer Patients’ Preference for Information and Communication Technologies
Presenter: Esra ildes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6062 - Unmet Needs in Oncology Research related to radiological response evaluation: a multi-center survey in three European countries
Presenter: Sophie Nisse Durgeat
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6109 - A program implementation to facilitate intraoperative brachytherapy between hospitals
Presenter: Marc Garcia Casellas
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1772 - Using Mobile-Based Health Care Applications Outcomes: Mini Systematic Review
Presenter: Aydanur Aydin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2792 - Evaluation of an education program for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Iraqi Amina
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3715 - iGestSaúde: Application for self-management of symptoms during chemotherapy treatment
Presenter: Bruno Magalhaes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3854 - Palliative care requirements of cancer patients and investigation of knowledge and expectations related to palliative care of the patients and their families
Presenter: Ozlem Topkaya
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4997 - Hospice care, what to expect? An exploration of the expectation of future hospice patients
Presenter: Merel van Klinken
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract