Abstract 4574
Background
Three recent RCT (Spartan, Prosper and Aramis) have demonstrated improved metastasis-free survival with new ARi Apalutamide (A), Enzalutamide (E) and Darolutamide (D), respectively, vs placebo (pl) in nmCRPC. We conducted a meta-analysis of RCT to evaluate the safety of ARi.
Methods
Random-effects meta-analysis was performed to describe pooled odds ratio (OR) vs pl and presence of heterogeneity in the effect among RCT. Network meta-analysis was performed to describe OR of indirect comparisons.
Results
4104 patients were included in safety analysis. Many adverse events (AEs) (falls, fractures, fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, hypertension, rash) showed a significant difference in the incidence in patients receiving pl, mostly higher in the Spartan trial. The use of ARi was associated with an higher risk of developing selected AEs compared to pl: serious AEs (OR 1.28, 95%CI 1.10-1.50); falls (OR 1.81, 95%CI 1.40-2.34); fractures (OR 1.58, 95%CI 1.11-2.23); fatigue (all grades OR 2.00, 95%CI 1.68-2.39; severe OR 2.21, 95%CI 1.06-4.60); rash (OR 4.90, 95%CI 3.24-7.41); diarrhea (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.00-1.54); hypertension (all grades OR 1.55, 95%CI 1.25-1.92; severe OR 1.44, 95%CI 1.08-1.92); dizziness (OR 1.67, 95%CI 1.26-2.21), mental impairment (OR 1.73, 95%CI 1.13-2.66). Significant heterogeneity in the effect among ARi was found for falls (D better than E: OR 0.29, 95%CI 0.14-0-60; D better than A: OR 0.48, 95%CI 0.25-0.91); fatigue all grades (D better than E: OR 0.59, 95%CI 0.39-0.88; A better than E: OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.44-0.84) and severe (D Better than E: OR 0.10, 95%CI 0.02-0.60); hypertension (D better than E: OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.27-0.98; A better than E: OR 0.53, 95%CI 0.31-0.92); mental impairment (D better than E: OR 0.15, 95%CI 0.04-0.58; D better than A: OR 0.24, 95%CI 0.06-0.90). No significant heterogeneity was found for other AEs.
Conclusions
With the limitations of the network meta-analysis, our findings suggest that the use of ARi in nmCRPC is associated with a statistically significant increased risk of developing selected AEs according to the type of agent used. Potential specific toxicities should be considered before starting ARi in nmCRPC.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Altavilla: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen. M. Di Maio: Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): Merck Sharp & Dohme; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): Takeda; Research grant / Funding (institution): Tesaro. M. Tucci: Honoraria (self): Astellas; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. U. De Giorgi: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant / Funding (institution): roche; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Advisory / Consultancy: Astellas; Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bristol Meyer Squibb; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4596 - A Phase 2, Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter Trial of Encorafenib + Binimetinib Evaluating a Standard-dose and a High-dose Regimen in Patients With BRAFV600-Mutant Melanoma Brain Metastasis (MBM) (POLARIS)
Presenter: Michael Davies
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1891 - Continuation of annual screening mammograms and breast-cancer mortality in women over 70
Presenter: Xabier Garcia De Albeniz
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5587 - Introducing standardized medical procedure and dynamic decision support program in precision oncology for the community of practice
Presenter: Istvan Petak
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4757 - Effectively using primary care givers in oncology care through capacity building, task sharing and techno-mentoring.
Presenter: Dinesh Pendharkar
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4497 - A single institution review of capecitabine related acute admissions and cost analysis
Presenter: Gemma Dart
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2187 - Health status of middle-aged and older cancer survivors in China: results from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)
Presenter: Jiarui Li
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5101 - Crossed looks on lung cancer perception and knowledge from general public and physicians in France: results of a two-fold survey
Presenter: Céline Mascaux
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4354 - Knowledge and perception of clinical trials (CTs) and attitude towards participation among Polish oncological patients - A pilot survey
Presenter: Artur Kotowski
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3499 - Achieving best possible cancer treatment outcomes in care pathways through benchmarking; ABC-Benchmarking
Presenter: Anke Wind
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2270 - Impact of 10-day Fulbright Specialist Program (FSP) and Project Pink Blue (PPB) Education Sessions on Medical Oncology knowledge among Doctors that treat cancer in Nigeria
Presenter: Mike Martin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract