Abstract 3517
Background
The role of FDG-PET/CT in the FU of LA-HNSCC is unclear.
Methods
Scan reports of LA-HNSCC patients, having FU-FDG-PET/CT performed 6-18 months after ST/CRT were retrospectively analyzed. Equivocal reports were scored as positive. Excluded were patients with proven recurrence before FU-FDG-PET/CT. The reference standard was the occurrence of a second primary (SP) or a recurrence < 12 months after FU-FDG-PET/CT. Primary endpoints included sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) on a patient level.
Results
We identified 73 patients. Primary tumor site: oropharynx: n = 35; 7 larynx: n = 7; hypopharynx: n = 11; oral cavity: n = 4; paranasal sinus: n = 4; unknown: n = 5. Tumor stage (UICC 7): II (T2N0): n = 1; III: n = 9; IV: n = 63. T1: n = 8; T2: n = 20; T3: n = 16; T4: n = 24. N0: n = 10; N1: n = 7; N2: n = 53; N3: n = 2. Patients were treated by CRT (n = 29) or ST (n = 44). A prior FDG-PET/CT at 3 months after end of treatment (EOT) (EOT-FDG-PET/CT) had been performed in 69/73 (60 negative, 6 false and 3 true positive [resected lymph nodes]). FU-FDG-PET/CT in patients without EOT-FDG-PET/CT was true negative in 3 patients and true positive in 1. Median time between EOT and FU-FDG-PET/CT was 12 months (range 6-17). Median FU after FU-FDG-PET/CT was 48 months (range 2-130). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 83% (95% CI 52-98), 87% (95% CI 76-94), 56% (95% CI 31-78) and 96% (95% CI 87-100), respectively. Local recurrences, SP and distant metastases were detected in 5, 1, and 4 patients, respectively. One FU-FDG-PET/CT-detected local recurrence and 1 SP were treated with curative intent. All false-positive patients (n = 8) underwent biopsy (n = 3) or surgery (n = 5). 15 patients (21%) recurred > 12 months after FU-FDG-PET-CT. Median overall survival was 49 (95% CI 29 - 68) and 98 months (95% CI 86-111) in FU-FDG-PET/CT-positive and -negative patients, respectively (p = 0.000196).
Conclusions
FU-FDG-PET/CT in real-life has a high NPV and significant prognostic value. However, false-positive scans induce invasive procedures in a significant fraction of patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4614 - Predictors of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitors in Naïve and Ipilimumab-Refractory Melanoma
Presenter: Domenico Mallardo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2901 - IFN-γ/IL-10 ratio as predictive biomarker for response to anti-PD-1 therapy in metastatic melanoma patients
Presenter: Emilio Giunta
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2306 - Multiplex Chromogenic Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Spatial Analysis of Checkpoint-Positive Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs)
Presenter: Scott Ely
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1678 - The role of PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in advanced renal cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.
Presenter: Alberto Carretero-Gonzalez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5138 - Radiomic Features as a Non-invasive Biomarker to Predict Response to Immunotherapy in Recurrent or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma
Presenter: Kye Jin Park
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5800 - Integrative combination of high-plex digital profiling techniques and cluster analysis to reveal complex immune biology in the tumor microenvironment of mesothelioma
Presenter: Carmen Ballesteros-Merino
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5736 - Predictive factors of response to immunotherapy in 198 patients with metastatic non-microcytic lung cancer (mNSCLC): real world data from 2 university hospitals in Spain
Presenter: Juan Felipe Cordoba Ortega
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5645 - Evaluating Lung CT Density Changes Among Patients with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) Treated with Thoracic Radiotherapy (TRT) alone or TRT Followed by Combined Ipilimumab (IPI) and Nivolumab (NIVO).
Presenter: Kujtim Latifi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1540 - Immuno-oncology therapy biomarkers differences between polyoma-virus positive and negative Merkel cell carcinomas
Presenter: Zoran Gatalica
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4538 - Can we improve patient selection for phase 1 clinical trials (Ph1) based on Immuno-Oncology score prognostic index (VIO)?
Presenter: Ignacio Matos Garcia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract