Abstract 1500
Background
Docetaxel (Doc) was initially licenced for CRPC (TAX327) but more recently trials showed Doc at HSPC diagnosis improved survival, shifting patterns of use. Higher neutropenic toxicity rates were reported in the HSPC trials, but it is unclear if this was due to the Doc timing or differences in case-mix. We compared sepsis rates for Doc at HSPC and CRPC using routine NHS data for men randomised in STAMPEDE in England.
Methods
STAMPEDE patient data were linked to routine NHS data (Hospital Episode Statistics: HES; Systemic Anti-Cancer Therapy: SACT). Patient note review (ref) linked to NHS data assessed admission rates by HSPC & CRPC Doc at 1 site (N = 44) and were used to develop and validate algorithms for detecting sepsis events across the entire data set. Algorithms were restricted to sepsis-only & sepsis + neutropenia (S+N) (N = 3645). Missing HES CRPC Doc regimens were imputed with HES (N = 3645) or enhanced with SACT (N = 1573). Odds ratios (OR) were calculated for risk of sepsis (OR < 1 = lower risk for HSPC).
Results
Sepsis rates varied by method; for most, rates at CRPC were higher than in TAX327 but similar to or higher than reported STAMPEDE HSPC data.Table:
862P
HSPC Sepsis/Pts | CRPC Sepsis/Pts | % diff | OR, 95% CI | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
N | % | N | % | |||
Ref | ||||||
2/15 | 13 | 6/22 | 27 | -14 | 0.4 (0.1 - 2.1) | |
HES | ||||||
Sepsis | 69/834 | 8 | 114/1183 | 10 | -2 | 0.9 (0.6 - 1.2) |
S+N | 134/834 | 16 | 148/1183 | 13 | 3 | 1.3 (1.0 - 1.6) |
Imputed | 134/834 | 16 | 489/1351 | 36 | -20 | 0.4 (0.4 - 0.6) |
+ SACT | 41/200 | 21 | 60/297 | 20 | 1 | 1.0 (0.7 - 1.6) |
Conclusions
This analysis does not support the hypothesis that HSPC Doc has a higher sepsis risk than Doc use in CRPC. Sepsis rates found using routine data were higher than in the TAX327 trial but similar to reported “real world” CRPC data. Rates varied by data-identification method used; for most, CRPC sepsis rates were higher or similar to HSPC rates & overall a little higher than the reported STAMPEDE HSPC rate. These data suggest CRPC Doc has a similar or higher sepsis rate than use in HSPC & this should be factored into discussions for men with newly-diagnosed metastatic HSPC and supports Doc use in this setting.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The STAMPEDE Trial Group.
Funding
University of Warwick, Warwick Medical School (HM PhD studentship).
Disclosure
M.K.B. Parmar: Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (institution): Clovis oncology; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), The Unit I am Director of also receives educational grants and other non- financial support from a large number of different companies: Other. P. Patel: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche/Genentech. M.R. Sydes: Honoraria (self): Lilly; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Janssen; Research grant / Funding (self): Astellas Pharma; Research grant / Funding (self): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (self): Clovis Oncology. N.D. James: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pierre Fabre; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ferring; Honoraria (self): Oncogenex; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5007 - Functional systemic CD4 immunity is required for clinical responses to PD-L1/PD-1 blockade therapy
Presenter: Miren Zuazo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5760 - Landscape of PD-L1 expression status in Chinese solid tumor patients.
Presenter: Yi Zhong
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3733 - Anti-cancer and immunomodulatory effects of cobimetinib in triple negative breast cancer
Presenter: Chun-Yu Liu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4426 - Differential expression of immunoregulatory molecules and highly-associated cancer genes may provide novel insights into strategic trial design for therapeutics
Presenter: Jacob Adashek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2752 - Insights into the Tumor Immune Microenvironment using Tissue Phenomics to Drive Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Martin Groher
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5713 - Immune competent somatic mosaic model of colorectal cancer
Presenter: Stefania Napolitano
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1898 - Genomic correlates of response to anti-PDL1 Atezolizumab in non-small-cell lung cancer OAK and POPLAR trials
Presenter: Hari Singhal
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3246 - Erdafitinib (erda) versus available therapies in advanced urothelial cancer: A matching adjusted indirect comparison
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3311 - High level of activity of Nivolumab anti-PD-1 immunotherapy and favorable outcome in metastatic/refractory MSI-H non-colorectal cancer: Results of the MSI cohort from the French AcSé program
Presenter: Christophe Tournigand
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2314 - TP53 and ATM Co-mutation Predicts Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Yu Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract