Abstract 4942
Background
The evaluation of response for brain metastases (BM) may be challenging in the context of treatment by stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or immunotherapy or both, which represent major therapeutic options for melanoma BM.
Methods
We reviewed clinical and neuroimaging data of 62 melanoma patients with newly diagnosed BM treated by the combination of immunotherapy and SRT (n = 33, group A), immunotherapy alone (n = 10, group B) or SRT alone or in combination with other systemic therapies (BRAF inhibitors, n = 7; alkylating agents, n = 6; no systemic treatment, n = 6), (n = 19, group C). Response was assessed using RECIST 1.1, RANO or iRANO criteria.
Results
BRAF mutations were noted in 26 patients. Until BM diagnosis, a median of 1 (range 1-4) line of systemic treatment was given. At BM diagnosis, median age was 58 years (range 23-85.5). Fifty-four patients (87%) had 1-3 metastases. The median maximum diameter was 18.5 mm (range, 9-49). The median DS-GPA was 3 (1-4). After a median follow-up of 30.5 months for surviving patients, 39 patients have experienced CNS progression, 16 (48.5%) in group A, 9 (90%) in group B, 14 (73.5%) in group C. Median PFS was 129.5 days (range 82-532) in group A, 75 days (range 35-203) in group B, 136 days (range 59-514) in group C. Forty-seven patients (76%) had died at the time of the analysis, 22 (66.5%) in group A, 7 (70%) in group B, 18 (94.5%) in group C. Median OS was 345 days (range 65-1824) in group A, 174.5 days (range 50-1361) in group B, 409 days (range 102-1244) in group C. 52 MRI scans were available for central review: pseudoprogression was documented in 9 patients (29%) in group A, 0 (0%) in group B, and 5 (29.5%) in group C. Response rates were similar with all three sets of response criteria. Progressive disease was less often called when applying iRANO to assess SRT target lesions.
Conclusions
While the retrospective nature and small sample size for subgroups are major limitations of this study, these data may indicate that the omission of SRT from first-line treatment may compromise outcome. Pseudoprogression is uncommon with immunotherapy alone; pseudoprogression rates were similar after SRT alone or in combination with immunotherapy or other systemic treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
University Hospital of Zurich.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5444 - Analysis of the tumor microenvironment and tumor genotype through different stages of lung adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Peter Zink
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3124 - Does Progress achieved in the Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) reach the Elderly Population?
Presenter: Jorune Suipyte
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5142 - Prognostic factors for non-small cell lung cancer patients with driver mutation negative and brain metastases (HOT 1701)
Presenter: Yoshihito Ohhara
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1580 - A novel risk classification system based on nomogram scores to predict survival of patients presenting with brain metastases at the first diagnosis of NSCLC
Presenter: Pengfei Cui
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4442 - Comparison of real-world response rate (rwRR) to RECIST-based response rate in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC)
Presenter: Xinran Ma
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5405 - Estimating the cost and survival impact of new aNSCLC therapies in Canada with the iTEN model
Presenter: Parneet Kaur Cheema
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1893 - SMARCA4 Deficient Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): A Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) Study
Presenter: Stephen Graziano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5582 - Exploring Resistance to Nivolumab [NIV] applying an Immune Genomic Signature (IGS) in advanced pretreated NSCLC [PRINCiPe study]
Presenter: Sara Pilotto
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1408 - DNA damage repair deficiency is associated with early resistance to crizotinib: whole-genome analysis in non-small cell lung cancer patients with ALK-fusion
Presenter: Dongyun He
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5751 - Phase 3 ALTA-3 study of brigatinib (BRG) vs alectinib (ALC) in patients (pts) with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)−positive non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that progressed on crizotinib (CRZ)
Presenter: Sanjay Popat
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract