Abstract 3632
Background
Combination IPI+PD1 immunotherapy has a high initial response rate, but patients can subsequently progress. The best management of this acquired resistance is unknown. We sought to explore the efficacy and safety of rechallenge IPI+PD1 in this setting.
Methods
Retrospective data from four melanoma centres were reviewed. Demographics, disease characteristics, initial and rechallenge treatment efficacy and toxicity were examined.
Results
15 patients (pt) were identified: 60% male, median age 51y, 40% BRAF mutant. 14 pt received IPI+PD1 as 1st line of treatment, 1 received prior BRAFi+MEKi. 9 pt received ipilimumab (I) 3mg/Kg and nivolumab (N) 1mg/kg (I3N1), 5 received I 1mg/kg and pembrolizumab (P) 2mg/kg, 1 patient I 100mg q12w/P200mg q3w, with a median 4 cycles of I. 1 pt had CR, 10 had PR, and 4 prolonged SD (>6 months) to initial treatment. 7 pt (47%) developed significant irAE (4 hepatitis, 2 colitis, 1 pneumonitis), of which 6 (85%) ceased IPI + PD1 and only 1 pt continued PD1 alone. Median time to progression (TTP1) was 11 months (range 5-31 months). After progression, 5 (33%) had no intervening systemic therapy prior to rechallenge IPI+PD1 (of which 3 progressed on while receiving maintenance PD1), 5 had BRAFi/MEKi (33%), 2 (13%) had anti-PD1 monotherapy, 2 (13%) had investigational immunotherapy agents on a trial, and 1 pt had DTIC. At rechallenge, 13 pt received I3N1, 1pt I1N3 and 1 pt I3q12w + N1q2w, with a median 2 cycles of I. Only 1 pt had PR, 1 had SD, while 13 (87%) had PD, with mPFS2 only 2.7 mo (95% CI 2- NA). OS from rechallenge was 7.5 mo (95% CI 6.7- NA). All 7 pt with prior treatment-limiting irAE had the same irAE recur, except for 1 pt who died one week after re-exposure of PD, and 1 pt with prior pneumonitis who remained on 10mg prednisone without recurrence.
Conclusions
Rechallenge with IPI + PD1 appears to have little efficacy in those with acquired resistance and prior toxicity often recurs. An expanded multi-institutional analysis is under way.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
A. Hepner: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. M.S. Carlino: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: AMGEN; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. D.B. Johnson: Advisory / Consultancy: Array Biopharma; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): Incyte; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Genentech. O.A. Michielin: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD. G.V. Long: Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Mass-Array; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. A.M. Menzies: Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4692 - Immune cell biomarkers on neo-adjuvant chemo-immunotherapy treatment for resectable stage IIIA NSCLC patients
Presenter: Raquel Laza-Briviesca
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1707 - Clinical utility of precision immunoprofiling and monitoring of the tumor microenvironment using flow cytometry and CyTOF in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with atezolizumab: results from a phase II study for biomarker analysis (EPOC1702)
Presenter: Keisuke Kirita
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3594 - Tumor mutation burden (TMB), PD-L1, IFN-γ signaling identify subgroups of patients (pts) who benefit from durvalumab (D, anti-PDL1) or D and tremelimumab (T, anti-CTLA4) treatment in urothelial bladder cancer (UC)
Presenter: Christophe Massard
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
744 - The decrease of TMB, TNB and HLA expression are the Mechanism of Drug Resistance of NSCLC to immunosuppressive PD-1/PD-l1.
Presenter: Sheng Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2350 - Eosinophilia during treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) predicts succeeding onset of immune-related adverse events (irAEs)
Presenter: Rika Kizawa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5930 - A transcriptomic immunologic signature predicts favorable outcome in neoadjuvant chemotherapy treated triple negative breast tumors.
Presenter: Javier Pérez-peña
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6127 - Alterations of TMB and TCR repertoires during Chemotherapy in East Asian lung cancer patients without TKI-related driver gene mutations
Presenter: Lele Song
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1310 - Association of SCFA in gut microbiome and clinical response in solid cancer patients treated with andi-PD-1 antibody.
Presenter: Motoo Nomura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2286 - Extracellular matrix and tissue derived metabolites in a liquid biopsy identifies endotypes of metastatic melanoma patients with differential response to immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment
Presenter: Nicholas Willumsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4107 - Pathologic scoring of pre-treatment H&E biopsies predicts overall survival in patients with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma receiving nivolumab monotherapy
Presenter: Julie Stein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract