Abstract 4082
Background
EGFR-TKIs are the preferred 1L therapy for pts with EGFRm metastatic NSCLC. However, treatment and survival in this population with 2L therapy and beyond are not well defined in the RW setting. To address this, we analysed RW cohort data in the USA, UK, Germany and France.
Methods
A retrospective chart review was conducted for 472 pts with EGFRm NSCLC receiving a 1L 1G / 2G EGFR-TKI (1 Jan 2015–31 Dec 2017). Data on 1L and 2L treatment and progression after 1L initiation (defined by clinical progression, start of 2L treatment or death before 2L treatment initiation) were extracted. 1L progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated via Kaplan–Meier methods.
Results
Baseline characteristics at 1L: median age 62 yrs; 43% female; 61% current/former smokers; 60% Caucasian; 76% Exon 19 deletion. 1L EGFR-TKI treatments: 44% afatinib; 36% erlotinib; 21% gefitinib. Median duration of overall follow-up from start of 1L was 19.9 months (mo; range 0.3–50.3). Of 472 pts, 344 (73%) progressed on 1L treatment, including 158 who died during follow-up. 128 (27%) pts did not progress: 86 (18%) remained on 1L treatment and 42 (9%) pts discontinued 1L treatment before follow-up end. Median 1L PFS (95% CI) was 14.5 (13.3, 15.6) mo and median OS (95% CI) from start of 1L was 34.6 (29.5, 45.5) mo. Of 344 pts with 1L progression, 255 (74%) were tested for T790M; 129 (38%) were positive, of whom 97 received osimertinib (75%). Of 126 pts testing negative, 17 (13%) received osimertinib. Of 344 pts with 1L progression, 258 (75%) received 2L treatment, osimertinib-containing regimens being most common (n = 109/258, 42%). For 86 (25%) pts with 1L progression but no 2L treatment, 73 (85%) died and 13 (15%) were alive at follow-up end.
Conclusions
25% of pts progressing on 1L EGFR-TKIs did not receive 2L treatment (due to death in most cases). Furthermore, 25% of pts who progressed on 1L treatment and tested T790M positive did not receive osimertinib. Findings indicate that rates of resistance mutation testing and utilisation of effective EGFRm NSCLC therapies may be suboptimal.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Robert Harrison, PhD, of iMed Comms, Macclesfield, UK, an Ashfield Company; funded by AstraZeneca.
Legal entity responsible for the study
AstraZeneca.
Funding
AstraZeneca.
Disclosure
R. Shah: Honoraria (self), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. N. Girard: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (self): AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim. S.P. Nagar: Advisory / Consultancy, Employee of RTI-HS who provides consulting services to AstraZeneca: AstraZeneca. F. Griesinger: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Pfizer, Celgene, Lilly, Roche, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Takeda, Siemens; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AbbVie. J. Roeper: Honoraria (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, AstraZeneca. K. Davis: Research grant / Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Novartis, Celgene, Sanofi, Pfizer, Amgen. N. Bakker: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. B. Thakrar: Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. A. Taylor: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. J. Feliciano: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eli Lilly.
Resources from the same session
4615 - Proteomic Profiling Identifies Molecular Basis of Adverse Event to BPM31510 Exposure: Rationale for Comprehensive Molecular Pharmacodynamics (PD) in Phase 1 Clinical Trial Design
Presenter: Vivek Subbiah
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5052 - Identification of first-in-class, naturally occurring LAG3 checkpoint inhibitor
Presenter: Gennady Bratslavsky
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5336 - Are Epigenetic therapies modifying sensitivity to conventional chemotherapy?
Presenter: Alexandra Bizot
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5739 - Oncogenic mutations at the dimer interface of EGFR lead to formation of covalent homo-dimers and allosteric activation of the kinase domain: A mechanism which alters the selectivity profile of oncogenic EGFR.
Presenter: Elizabeth Buck
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5492 - Basic selective estrogen receptor degraders (B-SERDs) in combination with novel BET inhibitors in ER+ breast cancer
Presenter: Rui Xiong
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5965 - EPI-7386 is a novel N-terminal domain androgen receptor inhibitor for the treatment of prostate cancer
Presenter: Ronan Le Moigne
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3582 - AVID200 neutralizes TGF-beta1 and -beta3, the principal immunosuppressive TGF-beta isoforms overexpressed by tumors, and sensitizes tumors to immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Presenter: Tina Gruosso
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1996 - High NAMPT expression and anti-tumor activity of NAMPT inhibitor in adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma
Presenter: Tomohiro Kozako
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4307 - TPX-0046 is a novel and potent RET/SRC inhibitor for RET-driven cancers
Presenter: Alexander Drilon
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4869 - In Vivo Evaluation of Cisplatin-loaded PEG-PCL Block Copolymeric Nanoparticles for Anticancer Drug Delivery
Presenter: Yingtzu Yen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract