Abstract 3565
Background
Pooled analyses from 2 phase III trials of patients (pts) with metastatic breast cancer (mBC) treated with eribulin (E) versus other chemotherapy showed improved overall survival (OS) favoring E. Subsequent subgroup analyses, including pts with visceral metastases (VM), also showed improved OS when treated with E. Current 3rd line mBC chemotherapy options include E, gemcitabine (G) and capecitabine (C), among others. This study evaluated 1-year (yr) OS in a real world setting among mBC pts with VM treated with E, G, or C in a US cancer center network.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated pts with mBC with biopsy proven VM (liver and/or lung), treated with E, G, or C in 3rd line chemotherapy from 1/1/2012 to 11/1/2018. Electronic health records and cancer registry data were used to detect differences in OS (number of mons from start of 3rd line until death). Univariate and multivariate analyses of 1-yr survival between E, G, and C were conducted using Kaplan Meier (KM) and Cox proportional hazard (CPH) models respectively.
Results
Of 1,828 mBC pts, 1,417 had VM, and 443 (27.5% triple negative, 13.7% HER2+ and 51.9% ER+/PR+) received 3rd line therapy with E = 229 (51.7%), G = 134 (30.2%) or C = 80(18.1%). On average, E, G, and C pts did not differ by age, ethnicity, BMI or ECOG score (categorized as good [0-1] and poor [>2]), but E pts had higher mean income compared to G or C. 1-yr KM survival analyses included 370 pts (n = 195 E, 117 G, and 58 C) with at least 1-yr follow up. 150 patients (45% E, 33% G, and 41% C) were alive at the end of 1-yr. Survival curves between E, G, and C differed significantly (Logrank p < 0.05; Wilcoxon p < 0.05). Censored median survival of E pts was 9.75 mons compared to 6.95 for G (p < 0.05) and 7.48 for C pts, respectively. CPH analysis adjusted for age, ethnicity, ECOG score, BMI, and adverse events showed significant survival benefit for E pts compared to G (HR = 0.71, p < 0.05), but no significant differences between E vs C or C vs G pts.
Conclusions
This real-world 1-yr survival analysis of pts with mBC and VM demonstrated significantly better OS for pts receiving E as compared to G, and a trend favoring OS for patients receiving E in comparison to C.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eisai Inc.
Funding
Eisai Inc.
Disclosure
S.M. Kazmi: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai, Takeda, Lilly, Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck, Takeda. E. Wang: Non-remunerated activity/ies, Eisai employee at the time of research: Eisai. R.S. Hauser: Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai. P.A. Kaufman: Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution), research grant support, and consulting fees: Eisai. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2686 - Clinicopathological characteristics, survival and prognostic factors of breast cancer-related microangiopathic haemolytic anemia: a multicenter study
Presenter: Marion Alhenc Gelas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1565 - Metabolic tumor volume by 18F-FDG PET/CT is an independent prognostic factor in metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Heekyung Ahn
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4498 - Patient Preferences for breast cancer treatments: A Discrete Choice Experiment from four European countries
Presenter: Thomais Konstantopoulou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1423 - Palbociclib plus fulvestrant as second- or later-line therapy for patients with locally advanced, inoperable or metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer in Germany: Interim results of the INGE-B phase 2 study
Presenter: Diana Lüftner
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2284 - Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt for CNS Metastasis in Breast Cancer: Clinical Outcomes Based on Intrinsic Subtype
Presenter: Hee Kyung Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4598 - Administration of chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer near the end of life: a population registry study
Presenter: Luisa Edman Kessler
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5706 - Prognostic value of histological growth pattern in patients operated for breast cancer liver metastases
Presenter: Ali Bohlok
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1697 - Illness perceptions, quality of life and mood in metastatic breast cancer patients
Presenter: Isabel Domingues
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1935 - Multidisciplinary Treatments Increases Overall Survival in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Stage IV Breast Cancer:An Analysis of 2010–2014 SEER Data
Presenter: Jian Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3875 - Correlation of radiotherapy with the prognosis of elderly patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer according to immunohistochemical subtyping
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract