Abstract 3395
Background
The usefulness of re-sentinel node biopsy (re-SNB) is unclear in the management of patients with ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients with locally recurrent breast cancer who underwent re-SNB from July 2012 to March 2019. Both radioactive colloid and indocyanine green were used in all cases.
Results
Forty-four patients were after SNB and 8 were after axillary lymph node dissection(ALND). SLNs were successfully visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 94.2% (49/52) of cases (95.4% post-SNB vs. 87.5% post-ALND, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.401). Among post-SNB patients with successful mapping, 50% had SLNs only in ipsilateral axilla(I) and 50% had at least one SLN in other regions(contralateral axilla [C] and/or parasternal region [P])with or without SLN in (I), compared to 28.6% and 71.4% in post-ALND cases respectively(p = 0.424). Among post-SNB cases with prior breast irradiation (n = 37), 44.4% had SLN only in (I) and 55.6% had at least one SLN in other regions, compared to 83.3% and 16.7% in cases without prior irradiation (n = 7) (p = 0.184), respectively. While these differences were not significant, a lower rate of visualization and higher frequency of aberrant lymphatic flow in post-ALND than those in post-SNB was noted, and prior irradiation might affect lymphatic flow. We tried re-SNB for 47 cases and SLNs were successfully removed in 45 (95.7%) patients (92.8% in post-SNB, 100% in post-ALND). Re-SNB for (I) was performed for all cases with hot spots in (I) and one case without hot spot. Re-SNB for (C) or (P) were decided based on physician’s judgment. The SLN identification rates by site were 92.1% (35/38) for (I), 90.0% (9/10) for (C), and 100% (3/3) for (P). Sentinel node metastasis was found in three cases, all of which were in (I). ALND was performed in one case with macrometastasis but was omitted in two cases with micrometastases. The median follow-up duration after re-SNB was 22 months and no recurrence was observed.
Conclusions
Sentinel node identification was possible with high detection rates among patients with recurrent breast cancer after prior breast-conserving and axillary surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T. Yamanaka: Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan. T. Yamashita: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Nippon Kayaku; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Kyowa kirin; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan; Honoraria (self): Takeda. N. Suganuma: Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Kyowa kirin; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3716 - Prognostic factors for predicting early recurrence within the first year of surgery in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Naru Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3947 - Integrated population pharmacokinetic modelling of liposomal irinotecan in patients with various tumour types, including untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Teresa Macarulla
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2880 - Expression of long noncoding RNA and clinical outcomes of pancreatic cancer patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy by S-1 or GEM after curative resection.
Presenter: Mariko Kamiya
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5029 - POLO: Time to treatment discontinuation and subsequent therapies following maintenance olaparib for patients (pts) with a germline BRCA mutation and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC)
Presenter: Eric Van Cutsem
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4730 - Diagnostic Value of Digital Multiplexed Detection of Single Nucleotide Variants in Pancreatic Cancer Specimens Collected by Endoscopic Ultrasound Fine-Needle Aspiration
Presenter: Irina Cazacu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3303 - Phase I/II study of LDE225 in combination with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Esther Pijnappel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2009 - Efficacy of platinum-containing chemotherapy and prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with homologous recombination deficiency: meta-analysis of published clinical studies
Presenter: Elizeveta Polyanskaya
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2164 - Plasmatic CXCL8 is a marker for TGFß-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) activation which may predict resistance to nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) in gemcitabine-refractory pancreatic cancer (PC) patients
Presenter: Valeria Merz
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2529 - A protein level signature of four selected genes associated with survival outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jie Hua
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4947 - Pre-treatment serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and survival in a Danish cohort of patients with pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Louise Rasmussen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract