Abstract 3395
Background
The usefulness of re-sentinel node biopsy (re-SNB) is unclear in the management of patients with ipsilateral recurrent breast cancer.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 52 patients with locally recurrent breast cancer who underwent re-SNB from July 2012 to March 2019. Both radioactive colloid and indocyanine green were used in all cases.
Results
Forty-four patients were after SNB and 8 were after axillary lymph node dissection(ALND). SLNs were successfully visualized by lymphoscintigraphy in 94.2% (49/52) of cases (95.4% post-SNB vs. 87.5% post-ALND, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.401). Among post-SNB patients with successful mapping, 50% had SLNs only in ipsilateral axilla(I) and 50% had at least one SLN in other regions(contralateral axilla [C] and/or parasternal region [P])with or without SLN in (I), compared to 28.6% and 71.4% in post-ALND cases respectively(p = 0.424). Among post-SNB cases with prior breast irradiation (n = 37), 44.4% had SLN only in (I) and 55.6% had at least one SLN in other regions, compared to 83.3% and 16.7% in cases without prior irradiation (n = 7) (p = 0.184), respectively. While these differences were not significant, a lower rate of visualization and higher frequency of aberrant lymphatic flow in post-ALND than those in post-SNB was noted, and prior irradiation might affect lymphatic flow. We tried re-SNB for 47 cases and SLNs were successfully removed in 45 (95.7%) patients (92.8% in post-SNB, 100% in post-ALND). Re-SNB for (I) was performed for all cases with hot spots in (I) and one case without hot spot. Re-SNB for (C) or (P) were decided based on physician’s judgment. The SLN identification rates by site were 92.1% (35/38) for (I), 90.0% (9/10) for (C), and 100% (3/3) for (P). Sentinel node metastasis was found in three cases, all of which were in (I). ALND was performed in one case with macrometastasis but was omitted in two cases with micrometastases. The median follow-up duration after re-SNB was 22 months and no recurrence was observed.
Conclusions
Sentinel node identification was possible with high detection rates among patients with recurrent breast cancer after prior breast-conserving and axillary surgery.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
T. Yamanaka: Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan. T. Yamashita: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Nippon Kayaku; Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Kyowa kirin; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan; Honoraria (self): Takeda. N. Suganuma: Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Novartis Pharma; Honoraria (self): Taiho; Honoraria (self): Kyowa kirin; Honoraria (self): Phizer Japan. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4906 - Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A restrospective study
Presenter: Sara Giovannoni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3919 - Prognostic significance of elements of the adaptive immunity in the microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Periklis Foukas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5139 - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a MITO24 retrospective study
Presenter: Alberto Farolfi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4212 - The prognostic impact of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
Presenter: Marc Cucurull Salamero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5123 - TP53 Hotspot mutations as immunoreactive neoantigens define a signature with differential survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer
Presenter: Marica Garziera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3795 - Use of bevacizumab (Bev) in real life for first-line (fl) treatment of ovarian cancer (OC)/ The GINECO ENCOURAGE cohort of 500 French patients
Presenter: Dominique Berton-Rigaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2359 - Phase II study: Letrozole maintenance therapy after first line chemotherapy in patients with advanced serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer
Presenter: Alexandra Tyulyandina
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3619 - Baseline IPI (Immune Prognostic Index) predicts survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
Presenter: Felix Blanc-Durand
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3474 - Preselecting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subsets to implement adoptive inmmunotherapy in ovarian cancer
Presenter: Diego Salas-Benito
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5134 - Early prediction of the platinum-resistant relapse risk using the CA125 modeled kinetic parameter KELIM: a pooled analysis of AGO-OVAR 7 & 9; ICON 7 (AGO/GINECO/ MRC CTU/GCIG trials).
Presenter: OLIVIER COLOMBAN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract