Abstract 3888
Background
The C-cubed study investigates the optimal treatment strategy in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We tested the superiority of a sequential treatment of FP+BEV followed by OX+FP+BEV (arm A: OX “wait & go”) at first progression to a combination treatment of OX+FP+BEV (arm B: OX “stop & go”), trial information: UMIN000015405.
Methods
The Primary endpoint was time-to-failure of strategy (TFS). A target sample size of 304 patients was considered sufficient to validate an expected Hazard Ratio (HR) for TFS of arm A compared with arm B with 80% power and 2-sided 5% α in case of a true HR value of < 0.69. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, overall survival (OS), progression-free survival, and safety.
Results
Between Dec 2014 and Sep 2016, 311 patients were enrolled, and 302 patients were randomized either to receive the arm A (n = 151) or B (n = 151) as a full analysis set (FAS). Superiority of TFS in the arm A was established in this study (HR, 0.475; 95% CI, 0.362–0.623; p < 0.0001). OSs in the arms A and B were not considered significantly different (HR, 0.930; 95% CI, 0.666–1.298). The patient population was predominantly positive for RAS mutant tumors (RAS MT) compared with that for RAS wild-type tumors (RAS WT), but this did not confer any clinical disadvantage in TFS to either arms (see table for details). We will present additional data associated with RAS status and differences between capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil at the meeting.Table:
571P
Table | Endpoint | Arm A, “wait & go” (n = 151) Months (95%CI) | Arm B, “stop & go” (n = 151) Months (95%CI) | p-value (log rank) |
---|---|---|---|---|
TFS (FAS) | 15.2 (12.5 – 17.2) | 7.6 (6.2 – 9.5) | <.0001 | |
OS (FAS) | 27.5 (24.4 – 32.7) | 29.4 (24.1 – 36.0) | 0.6692 | |
Factor | RAS WT (n = 112) Months (95%CI) | RAS MT (n = 167) Months (95%CI) | p-value (log rank) | |
TFS | Arm A | 14.0 (11.2 – 19.0) | 15.3 (12.4 – 17.2) | 0.3126 |
Arm B | 7.8 (7.0 – 10.5) | 7.4 (5.2 – 9.6) | 0.1615 | |
OS | Arm A | 27.5 (22.6 – NC) | 28.0 (23.4 – 32.7) | 0.3143 |
Arm B | 34.7 (24.5 – NC) | 24.3 (19.1 – 32.8) | 0.0265 |
Conclusions
The sequential “wait & go” strategy for OX was superior in TFS compared with the combinational “stop & go” accompanying with the equal survival benefit of nearly 30 months. Thus, the sequential approach with FP+BEV followed by OX is deemed an acceptable treatment strategy for patients with mCRC.
Clinical trial identification
UMIN000015405.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Japan South West Oncology Group (JSWOG).
Funding
Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Disclosure
T. Nagasaka: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eli Lilly Japan. Y. Shindo: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai; Research grant / Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant / Funding (self): Ono; Research grant / Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Research grant / Funding (institution): Lilly. A. Tsuji: Honoraria (institution): Daiichi Sankyo; Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Chugai Pharma; Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Merck Serono; Honoraria (institution), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Takeda Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb Japan. Y. Tsuji: Honoraria (institution): Bayer Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Merck Serono Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Eli Lilly Japan; Honoraria (institution): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd; Honoraria (institution): Medicon Co. Ltd. H. Mishima: Research grant / Funding (institution): Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5629 - Outcome of triple negative inflammatory breast cancers (TNIBC) treated with dose dense neoadjuvant epirubicin cyclophosphmide, prognostic impact of pre and post neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) and post NAC lymphovascular invasion
Presenter: Luca Campedel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5792 - A novel PET parameter for cancer stem cell metabolism: early prediction of chemosensitivity to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer
Presenter: Chanwoo Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3728 - Using nodal ratio to predict recurrence in patients with 4 or more positive lymph nodes early stage breast cancer
Presenter: Besma Graja
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3395 - Re-sentinel node biopsy for local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery
Presenter: Yuka Matsubara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4302 - Assessment of prognostic and therapeutic factors in men with breast cancer
Presenter: Daniel Herrero Rivera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4263 - Genomic Profiling of Chinese Breast Cancer Patients
Presenter: Zhonghua Tao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2406 - Genome copy number alteration burden represents predictor of response in long-term, never relapse exceptional responders of trastuzumab-treated HER2+ metastatic breast cancer
Presenter: Naomi Walsh
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2575 - Next-generation DNA Sequencing (NGS) Results for Tumors From Phase 2 ABRAZO Study of Talazoparib After Platinum or Cytotoxic Non-Platinum Regimens in Patients (pts) With Advanced Breast Cancer (ABC) and Germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA) Mutations
Presenter: Nicholas C. Turner
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4499 - FGFR1 and CCND1 gene amplifications are associated with breast cancer resistance to aromatase inhibitors
Presenter: Evgeny Imyanitov
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4110 - Clinicopathologic features of BRCA mutated breast cancer patients: Hacettepe Experience
Presenter: Sercan Aksoy
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract