Abstract 5579
Background
One of the critical ethical requirements of conducting clinical research regardless of the study setting is to obtain informed consent before enrolling subjects’ participants. It is crucial to ensure quality and validity of the informed consent of study’s participants.
Methods
We used a quantitative survey design using the Italian validated version of the Quality of Informed Consent (QuIC) questionnaire. We included 7 Italian cancer sites and 300 clinical trials patients.
Results
All the patients invited accepted to fill the questionnaire. Most of them were male (N = 130), and the mean age was 60 (sd 10). Most of them were satisfied with the information received, and they considered themselves to be well informed. The average score for objective understanding was 62.2 and for subjective understanding was 74.6 (p < 0.001). Subjects responded correctly to questions about the general understanding of participation in research. Only 33% understood which procedures were experimental, and 40% of respondents knew foreseeable risks or discomfort from the research. In ANOVA analysis, an increased understanding was associated with a higher level of education.
Conclusions
Our results suggest that investigators should invest more effort to improve clinical trials subjects reach a safer understanding of the informed consent. The clinical trials nursing role is crucial to protect the clinical trial participants rights.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Gianluca Catania.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2171 - CCND1 Amplification Contributes to Immunosuppression in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma and the Association with a Poor Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors
Presenter: Chloe Huang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2624 - Efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer patients with sensitive genes mutation
Presenter: Hui-Juan Cui
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3494 - Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) kinetics as predictors of outcomes in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with nivolumab (N).
Presenter: Audrey Simonaggio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3964 - Predictive markers of checkpoint inhibitor activity in adult metastatic solid tumours
Presenter: Alexandra Pender
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3041 - Blood-based TMB (bTMB) correlates with tissue-based TMB (tTMB) in a multi-cancer Phase I IO Cohort
Presenter: Daniel Araujo
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3910 - Analysis of Molecular Profile Complexities for Immunotherapy Decision Support
Presenter: Robert Dóczi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4836 - The Role of Tumor Neoantigens in the Differential Response to Immunotherapy (IO) in EGFR and BRAF Mutated Lung Cancers - Quantity or Quality?
Presenter: Katrina Case
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1929 - Impact of previous corticosteroid (CS) exposure on efficacy of Programmed Cell Death-(Ligand) 1 blockade in patients with advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a single Center retrospective analysis
Presenter: Fabrizio Nelli
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2601 - Comparison 18F-FDG-PET/CT criteria for prediction of therapy response and clinical outcome in patients with metastatic melanoma treated with Ipilimumab and PD-1 inhibitors
Presenter: Sabrina Vari
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3628 - Predictive model for survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with frontline pembrolizumab
Presenter: Xabier Mielgo Rubio
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract