Abstract 2283
Background
The increasing availability of targeted agents for treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) necessitates accurate and timely molecular characterisation of disease. As a minimally invasive test, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is well positioned to overcome many of the limitations associated with traditional tumor biopsies. Here, we established a program to assess the feasibility of routine prospective ctDNA testing for the clinical management of mBC patients.
Methods
Detection of somatic mutations from patient plasma was performed using a multiplexed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) approach to identify hotspot mutations in PIK3CA, ESR1, ERBB2 and AKT1. In parallel, a subset of samples were also analysed via next generation sequencing (targeted amplicon (TA) sequencing and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing). Results were discussed at a multidisciplinary breast cancer meeting prior to therapy selection.
Results
234 mBC patients were enrolled on this study, with a median age at diagnosis of 54 years (28-80) and a median of 2 lines of prior therapy. The average turnaround time for ctDNA testing using ddPCR was 9 days (1-49). Using ddPCR, 80/234 (34.2%) patients had ≥1 mutation identified, with 52/234 (22.2%) patients having an alteration in PIK3CA, 35/234 (15.0%) in ESR1, 9/234 (3.8%) in AKT1 and 2/234 (0.9%) in ERBB2. TA sequencing performed in the first 159 patients, identified actionable mutations (classified using the OncoKB database) in 63 patients (39.6%) and showed that a mean variant allele fraction of > 5% was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (Hazard ratio: 1.8; 95% Confidence interval: 1.1-3.1; p < 0.02). Of 97/234 patients where an actionable alteration was identified, the result influenced clinical management in 41 (42.3%), including 18 who were enrolled in a clinical trial. In one patient initially diagnosed with ER+/HER2- disease, a HER2 gene amplification was identified through ctDNA analysis leading to the initiation of HER2-targeted treatment and a near complete metabolic response to treatment.
Conclusions
Prospective ctDNA testing of mBC patients is a practical and feasible approach to guide clinical trial enrolment and patient management.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council Australia.
Disclosure
S.Q. Wong: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bio-Rad Laboratories. S. Dawson: Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract