Abstract 2283
Background
The increasing availability of targeted agents for treatment of metastatic breast cancer (mBC) necessitates accurate and timely molecular characterisation of disease. As a minimally invasive test, circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is well positioned to overcome many of the limitations associated with traditional tumor biopsies. Here, we established a program to assess the feasibility of routine prospective ctDNA testing for the clinical management of mBC patients.
Methods
Detection of somatic mutations from patient plasma was performed using a multiplexed droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) approach to identify hotspot mutations in PIK3CA, ESR1, ERBB2 and AKT1. In parallel, a subset of samples were also analysed via next generation sequencing (targeted amplicon (TA) sequencing and low-coverage whole-genome sequencing). Results were discussed at a multidisciplinary breast cancer meeting prior to therapy selection.
Results
234 mBC patients were enrolled on this study, with a median age at diagnosis of 54 years (28-80) and a median of 2 lines of prior therapy. The average turnaround time for ctDNA testing using ddPCR was 9 days (1-49). Using ddPCR, 80/234 (34.2%) patients had ≥1 mutation identified, with 52/234 (22.2%) patients having an alteration in PIK3CA, 35/234 (15.0%) in ESR1, 9/234 (3.8%) in AKT1 and 2/234 (0.9%) in ERBB2. TA sequencing performed in the first 159 patients, identified actionable mutations (classified using the OncoKB database) in 63 patients (39.6%) and showed that a mean variant allele fraction of > 5% was significantly associated with inferior overall survival (Hazard ratio: 1.8; 95% Confidence interval: 1.1-3.1; p < 0.02). Of 97/234 patients where an actionable alteration was identified, the result influenced clinical management in 41 (42.3%), including 18 who were enrolled in a clinical trial. In one patient initially diagnosed with ER+/HER2- disease, a HER2 gene amplification was identified through ctDNA analysis leading to the initiation of HER2-targeted treatment and a near complete metabolic response to treatment.
Conclusions
Prospective ctDNA testing of mBC patients is a practical and feasible approach to guide clinical trial enrolment and patient management.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
National Health and Medical Research Council Australia.
Disclosure
S.Q. Wong: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bio-Rad Laboratories. S. Dawson: Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2507 - KEYLYNK-010: Phase 3 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) Plus Olaparib (OLA) vs Enzalutamide (ENZA) or Abiraterone (ABI) in ENZA- or ABI-Pretreated Patients (pts) With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Had Progression on Chemotherapy (CTx)
Presenter: Evan Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2944 - PROSTRATEGY: A Spanish Genitourinary Oncology Group (SOGUG) multi-arm multistage (MAMS) phase III trial of immunotherapy strategies in high-volume metastasic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
Presenter: Jose Arranz Arija
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3535 - A phase 1 study of AMG 160, a half-life extended bispecific T cell engager (HLE BiTE) immuno-oncology therapy targeting PSMA, in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)
Presenter: Ben Tran
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4951 - ProBio: An outcome-adaptive, multi-arm, open-label, multiple assignment randomised controlled biomarker-driven trial in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (EudraCT: 2018-002350-78, NCT03903835)
Presenter: Johan Lindberg
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2892 - A phase 3 randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)
Presenter: Kim Chi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2427 - The Extended/Phase II Study of Safety And Tolerability Of Proxalutamide (GT0918) In Subjects With Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Who Failed Either Abiraterone (Abi) Or Enzalutamide (Enza)
Presenter: Nicholas Vogelzang
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3224 - Addition of an oral docetaxel treatment (ModraDoc006/r) to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with high risk N+M0 prostate cancer
Presenter: Marit Vermunt
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3312 - A phase II randomized, open-label study comparing salvage radiotherapy in combination with 6 months of androgen-deprivation therapy with LHRH agonist or antagonist versus anti-androgen therapy with apalutamide in patients with biochemical progression after radical prostatectomy.
Presenter: Piet Dirix
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2829 - Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and Updated Follow-Up From KEYNOTE-057: Phase 2 Study of Pembrolizumab (pembro) for Patients (pts) With High-Risk (HR) Non–Muscle Invasive Bladder Cancer (NMIBC) Unresponsive to Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG)
Presenter: Ronald de Wit
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract