Abstract 2860
Background
Although, previous studies reported that metabolic response (MR) assessed by post-CRT 18FDG-PET was associated with survival outcomes in ESCC treated with dCRT, there are few data on the prognostic value of each metabolic response category after induction chemotherapy prior to dCRT and after completion of dCRT.
Methods
In this retrospective study, we evaluated prognostic value of MR after completion of induction chemotherapy and after completion of dCRT in 382 localized ESCC pts receiving induction chemotherapy followed by dCRT from January 2012 to February 2018 at Asan Medical Center in Korea. MR was assessed by EORTC criteria.
Results
MR after induction chemotherapy was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). MR after dCRT was also significantly associated with PFS and OS. MR after either induction chemotherapy or dCRT remained significant after adjusting for other prognostic factors such as clinical TNM stage, sex, and ECOG performance status. Whereas pts achieving mCR/mPR or mPD after either induction chemotherapy or dCRT had good prognosis or poor prognosis, respectively, the prognostic value of mSD was different between post-induction chemotherapy and post-dCRT; it was similar to that of mPR after induction chemotherapy, but it was similar to that of mPD after dCRT. Poorer MR to induction chemotherapy could predict the lack of MR after dCRT; the proportion of mSD/mPD after dCRT was 7.7% in pts with post-induction mCR vs. 16.0% in pts with vs. 40.0% in pts with post-induction mSD vs. 100% in pts with post-induction mPD (p = 0.001).Table:
762P
Post induction chemotherapy | Post-dCRT | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
metabolic response | N | HR for PFS (95% CI) | P-value | HR for OS (95% CI) | P-value | N | HR for PFS (95% CI) | P-value | HR for OS (95% CI) | P-value |
mCR | 13 | 1 | 1 | 150 | 1 | 1 | ||||
mPR | 106 | 3.348 (1.221-9.181) | 0.019 | 2.498 (1.008 - 6.192) | 0.048 | 164 | 2.182 (1.646-2.892) | 0.000 | 2.224 (1.694-2.919) | 0.000 |
mSD | 10 | 6.008 (1.179-20.150) | 0.004 | 3.640 (1.186-11.171) | 0.024 | 7 | 11.251 (5.088-24.878) | 0.000 | 9.659 (4.393-21.236) | 0.000 |
mPD | 2 | 59.209 (9.430-371.767) | 0.000 | 14.495 (2.676-78.503) | 0.002 | 39 | 21.768 (14.020-33.797) | 0.000 | 10.592 (7.016-15.989) | 0.000 |
diffuse esophagitis | 3 | 1.729 (0.193-15.482) | 0.624 | 1.103 (0.129-9.453) | 0.929 | 22 | 1.169 (0.651-2.098) | 0.601 | 1.482 (0.856-2.566) | 0.160 |
Total | 134 | 0.000 | 0.027 | 382 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Conclusions
MR after induction chemotherapy and after CRT had independent prognostic value with different prognostication between each other in ESCC pts receiving induction chemotherapy followed by dCRT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4331 - STING Agonist, ADU-S100, Yields Potent Antitumor Activity and Therapeutically Favorable Immune Profile in an Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Model
Presenter: Ali Zaidi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1770 - Increased assessment of HER2 in metastatic gastroesophageal cancer patients: a nationwide population-based cohort study
Presenter: Willemieke Dijksterhuis
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3755 - A new docetaxel (DOC)-based triplet regimen does not improve the outcome of metastatic (M) or locally advanced (LA) gastric cancer (GC) as compared with an epirubicin (EPI) standard triplet regimen: a GISCAD trial.
Presenter: Roberto Labianca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2439 - The analysis of T cell subsets and clinical efficacy of immune checkpoint blockades in patients with advanced gastric cancer using multiplex immunohistochemistry
Presenter: Tae-yong Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2211 - First-line pembrolizumab (P), trastuzumab (T), capecitabine (C) and oxaliplatin (O) in HER2-positive metastatic esophagogastric adenocarcinoma.
Presenter: Yelena Janjigian
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3046 - Monitoring patient-specific mutation in ctDNA and CTC for tumor response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer (NCT03425058)
Presenter: Tao Fu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4628 - Gastric cancer screening in BRCA 2 gene mutation carriers: should it be recommended?
Presenter: Inês Oliveira
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2127 - Interim analysis of an observational/translational study for nivolumab treatment in advanced gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-08 (DELIVER trial)
Presenter: Yu Sunakawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2264 - Prediction of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in Stage II/III gastric cancer treatment based on comprehensive gene expression analysis
Presenter: Masanori Terashima
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2444 - Assessing the clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA through longitudinal liquid biopsy sampling in Oesophageal adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Emma Ococks
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract