Abstract 2860
Background
Although, previous studies reported that metabolic response (MR) assessed by post-CRT 18FDG-PET was associated with survival outcomes in ESCC treated with dCRT, there are few data on the prognostic value of each metabolic response category after induction chemotherapy prior to dCRT and after completion of dCRT.
Methods
In this retrospective study, we evaluated prognostic value of MR after completion of induction chemotherapy and after completion of dCRT in 382 localized ESCC pts receiving induction chemotherapy followed by dCRT from January 2012 to February 2018 at Asan Medical Center in Korea. MR was assessed by EORTC criteria.
Results
MR after induction chemotherapy was significantly associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). MR after dCRT was also significantly associated with PFS and OS. MR after either induction chemotherapy or dCRT remained significant after adjusting for other prognostic factors such as clinical TNM stage, sex, and ECOG performance status. Whereas pts achieving mCR/mPR or mPD after either induction chemotherapy or dCRT had good prognosis or poor prognosis, respectively, the prognostic value of mSD was different between post-induction chemotherapy and post-dCRT; it was similar to that of mPR after induction chemotherapy, but it was similar to that of mPD after dCRT. Poorer MR to induction chemotherapy could predict the lack of MR after dCRT; the proportion of mSD/mPD after dCRT was 7.7% in pts with post-induction mCR vs. 16.0% in pts with vs. 40.0% in pts with post-induction mSD vs. 100% in pts with post-induction mPD (p = 0.001).Table:
762P
Post induction chemotherapy | Post-dCRT | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
metabolic response | N | HR for PFS (95% CI) | P-value | HR for OS (95% CI) | P-value | N | HR for PFS (95% CI) | P-value | HR for OS (95% CI) | P-value |
mCR | 13 | 1 | 1 | 150 | 1 | 1 | ||||
mPR | 106 | 3.348 (1.221-9.181) | 0.019 | 2.498 (1.008 - 6.192) | 0.048 | 164 | 2.182 (1.646-2.892) | 0.000 | 2.224 (1.694-2.919) | 0.000 |
mSD | 10 | 6.008 (1.179-20.150) | 0.004 | 3.640 (1.186-11.171) | 0.024 | 7 | 11.251 (5.088-24.878) | 0.000 | 9.659 (4.393-21.236) | 0.000 |
mPD | 2 | 59.209 (9.430-371.767) | 0.000 | 14.495 (2.676-78.503) | 0.002 | 39 | 21.768 (14.020-33.797) | 0.000 | 10.592 (7.016-15.989) | 0.000 |
diffuse esophagitis | 3 | 1.729 (0.193-15.482) | 0.624 | 1.103 (0.129-9.453) | 0.929 | 22 | 1.169 (0.651-2.098) | 0.601 | 1.482 (0.856-2.566) | 0.160 |
Total | 134 | 0.000 | 0.027 | 382 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Conclusions
MR after induction chemotherapy and after CRT had independent prognostic value with different prognostication between each other in ESCC pts receiving induction chemotherapy followed by dCRT.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5472 - Early response evaluation and CEA response in patients treated in a Danish randomized study comparing trifluridine/tipiracil (TAS-102) with or without bevazicumab in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Camilla Qvortrup
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2037 - Updated survival analysis of the randomized phase III trial comparing S-1 versus capecitabine in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (SALTO) by the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group.
Presenter: Johannes Kwakman
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3053 - JFMC51-1702-C7: Phase II study investigating efficacy and safety of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) plus bevacizumab (BEV) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory or intolerant to standard chemotherapies.
Presenter: Keisuke Kazama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3183 - Bevacizumab plus trifluridine/tipiracil in elderly patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC 1602): A single-arm, Phase 2 study
Presenter: Akitaka Makiyama
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3233 - Biweekly TAS-102 and Bevacizumab as a Third-Line Chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: A Phase II Multicenter Clinical Trial (TAS-CC4 study)
Presenter: Yoichiro Yoshida
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5907 - Liquid biopsy concordance based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Pashtoon Kasi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1866 - Plasma clearance of RAS mutation under therapeutic pressure is a rare event in metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Emilie Moati
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2312 - High Circulating miR-1247 is a marker for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with chemotherapy and cetuximab
Presenter: Jakob Schou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5602 - Clinical relevance of circulating tumor (ct)DNA genotyping for first line cetuximab-based treatment monitoring in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): a prospective multicentric study
Presenter: JOANA Vidal Barrull
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3182 - Clonal hematopoiesis mutations in plasma cfDNA RAS/BRAF genotyping of metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Beili Wang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract