Abstract 4523
Background
Ipilimumab (Ip) is an option in Metastatic Melanoma (MM) patients (pt) in case of disease progression after antiPD1 (AP) treatment and BRAF+MEK inhibitors (BMi) administration (for BRAF mutated melanoma). Clinical trial are evaluating potential Ip-based combinations in 2nd/3rd line setting. Many studies underline the role of some parameters (as LDH, ECOG PS, Neutrophile/Leucocyte ratio) as progostic factors for immunotherapy used in first-line. We evaluate the prognostic role of some relevant clinical or laboratoristic parameters for Ip used in late line after AP, Bmi, in order to define pt that benefit most from Ip monotherapy in this setting.
Methods
A retrospective multicenter study was conducted in 8 Italian Oncology Centers, evaluating MM pt treated with Ip after AP and/or BMi. Endpoints were OS and PFS, Kaplan Mayer and Cox regression were applied for survival analysis.
Results
Among 200 pt that received AP or Bmi, 48 were eligible for Ip administration in 2nd/3rd line. Before Ip treatment, ECOG PS was 0 in 21 pt, number of metastatic sites was less then 3 in 14 pt, LDH was within normal range in 19 pt, NLR ratio (= baseline neutrophils/total leukocytes) was less then 0.7 in 28 pt: in univariate analysis, only ECOG PS and NLR resulted significantly associated with better PFS and OS. For pt with ECOG PS 0 or 1 medianPFS was 3.2, 2.3 month respectively (p value 0.0066; HR 0.377 IC95% 0.186-0.762), median OS was 12.1, 4.0 respectively (p value 0.0016 HR 0.287 IC95% 0.132-0.622). For pt with NLR <0,7 or > 0,7 medianPFS was 3.2, 2.0 month respectively (p value 0.002 HR 0.241 IC95% 0.0978-0.593), median OS was 7.63, 2.67 respectively (p value 0.0037 HR 0.251 IC95% 0.0986-0.0637) A score was counted for each pt considering the number of favorable basal factors present (ECOG PS 0, NLR<0.7), from 0 to 2. For pt with SCORE 0,1,2 medianPFS was 4.8, 2.4, 1.4 month respectively (p value 0.0009), median OS was 25.6, 5.8, 1.9 respectively (p value <0.0001).
Conclusions
ECOG PS 0, NLR <0.7, resulted prognostic factors associated with favorable PFS and OS of MM pt treated with Ip after AP or BMi progression. Subgroup with all these factors has a better prognosis. These data can help treatment choice and should be evaluated prospectively.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Italian Melanoma Intergroup.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
R. Marconcini: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: La Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Incyte; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Ipsen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4758 - A Phase I Study of the CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Palbociclib in combination with Cetuximab and Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN); A Result of Dose Escalation Cohort
Presenter: Nuttapong Ngamphaiboon
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2607 - Single cycle induction treatment with Cisplatin/Docetaxel plus Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in Stage III-IVB head and neck squamous cell cancer (CheckRad-CD8 trial)
Presenter: Markus Hecht
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1388 - Radiotherapy plus cisplatin (CDDP) or cetuximab (C225) in human papilloma-virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal cancer (OPC)? A dillema finally resolved. An updated meta-analysis.
Presenter: Petar Suton
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1478 - Treatment outcomes of head and neck cancer patients 70 years and older receiving different chemo-radiation combinations.
Presenter: Majd Issa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3985 - Brachytherapy and non-cancer mortality in patients with oral cavity and oropharynx SCCs
Presenter: Jovian Yu
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4036 - Final results of a phase II study of induction chemotherapy (CT) with paclitaxel (PTX) and panitumumab (P) followed by radiotherapy (RT) and P in patients (pts) with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC) no candidates to platinum: study PANTERA
Presenter: Javier Martinez Trufero
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4779 - Window of Opportunity for Durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus Metformin Trial in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN): interim safety analysis
Presenter: Tony Richa
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2757 - Severe Oral Mucositis (SOM) Mitigation by Genetically Modified Lactococcus Lactis Bacteria (LLB) Producing Human Trefoil Factor 1 (hTFF1; AG013) in Patients Being Treated With Concomitant Chemoradiation (CRT) for Oral and Oropharyngeal Cancers (OCOPC)
Presenter: Suraj Singh
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5559 - Transcriptome signatures of treatment responses in a preoperative window of opportunity trial of nivolumab and tadalafil in resectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Presenter: Sanket Shukla
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3263 - Risk and Impact of Renal Impairment of Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients Who Received Chemoradiotherapy with Cisplatin
Presenter: Thana Patimarattananan
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract