Abstract 1602
Background
Currently there are no recognized or validated biomarkers to identify HCC patients(pts) likely to benefit from N. Several studies have established the inverse relationship between inflammation-based scores such as NLR, PLR and survival in other solid tumours treated with immunotherapy. We evaluated the relationship between NLR and PLR and survival outcomes in HCC pts treated with N at Mount Sinai Hospital.
Methods
One hundred and four HCC pts treated between June 2016 and July 2018 were identified. NLR=Absolute neutrophil count/ Absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) and was calculated pretreatment and at 6-8 weeks after 3 doses (Posttreatment) of N. PLR=Platelet count/ALC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and the log-rank test were used to calculate and compare Overall and Progression free survival (OS, PFS) between NLR <5 vs ≥ 5 and among PLR tertiles.
Results
Median age was 66 (29-89) years. Median treatment duration was 26 (2-149) weeks. Child Pugh score (CPS, N = 96) was A in 64 (66%) and B in 32 (33%) pts. Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage was B in 21 (20%) and C in 83 (80%) pts. Median follow-up time was 17 months (95% CI (15.7, 20.7). NLR was <5 in 64 (62%) pts pretreatment and 59 (60%) pts post treatment. NLR<5 was associated with improved OS compared to NLR≥5 both pretreatment (23 Vs 10 months, P = 0.0037) and post treatment (35 Vs 9 months, P < 0.0001). Survival also differed significantly among PLR tertiles (Table), with median OS for the lowest post treatment tertile not yet reached. Median PFS differed significantly between pre (16 Vs 5 months, P = 0.0217) and post (35 Vs 5 months, P = 0.0002) treatment NLR. PLR was not significantly associated with PFS. In a multivariable model, port treatment PLR and NLR were significantly associated with OS.Table:
744P
Pretreatment PLR group | N(%) | OS (months) | |
---|---|---|---|
< 119 | 36(36) | 35 | P = 0.0495 |
> = 119 & < 224 | 32(31) | 10 | |
> = 224 | 33(33) | 15 | |
Post treatment PLR group | |||
< 126 | 35(35) | Not Reached | P = 0.0126 |
> = 126 & < 229 | 31(31) | 19 | |
> = 229 | 33(33) | 10 |
Conclusions
This study suggests that lower NLR and PLR levels may predict better survival outcomes in HCC patients treated with N. The potential role of NLR and PLR as early predictors of immunotherapy outcomes in HCC pts warrants further evaluation.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Mount Sinai Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4413 - Infigratinib versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study in patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 gene fusions/translocations: the PROOF trial
Presenter: Ghassan Abou-Alfa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4710 - Phase 3 (COSMIC-312) study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) vs sorafenib (S) in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) who have not received previous systemic anticancer therapy
Presenter: Lorenza Rimassa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5509 - A Randomized Controlled, Open label, Adaptive Phase-3 Trial to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of EndoTAG-1 Plus Gemcitabine versus Gemcitabine alone in Patients with Measurable Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas Failed on FOLFIRINOX Treatment (NCT03126435)
Presenter: Li-Tzong Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1463 - Modified FOLFOX versus modified FOLFOX plus nivolumab and ipilimumab in patients with previously untreated advanced or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction – Moonlight, a randomized phase 2 trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO.
Presenter: Sylvie Lorenzen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2392 - GLOW: Randomized Phase 3 Study of Zolbetuximab + CAPOX Compared With Placebo + CAPOX as First-line Treatment of Patients With CLD18.2⁺/HER2⁻ Locally Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Manish Shah
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5217 - PRODIGE67_UCGI33 ARION: Association of Radiochemotherapy and Immunotherapy for the treatment of unresectable Oesophageal caNcer: a comparative randomized phase II trial
Presenter: Rosine Guimbaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1726 - Randomized phase II trial of weekly paclitaxel + ramucirumab versus weekly nab-paclitaxel + ramucirumab for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer with peritoneal dissemination refractory to first-line therapy: WJOG10617G/P-SELECT
Presenter: Kenro Hirata
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2279 - FRONTiER: A Feasibility Trial of Nivolumab With Neoadjuvant CF or DCF Therapy for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma
Presenter: Shun Yamamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4912 - A phase Ib/II study of AK104, a PD-1/CTLA-4 Bispecific Antibody, Combined With mXELOX as First-line Therapy for Advanced Gastric or Gastroesophageal Junction (GEJ) Adenocarcinoma
Presenter: Jiafu Ji
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3780 - Perioperative atezolizumab in combination with FLOT versus FLOT alone in patients with resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: DANTE, a randomized, open-label phase II trial of the German Gastric Group of the AIO and the SAKK.
Presenter: Salah-Eddin Al-Batran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract