Abstract 1871
Background
Much of the work of a busy oncology day unit is undocumented, especially the work involved in phone triage during the working hours of 8am to 6pm. Phone calls from patients, their family doctors, palliative care teams, or from within the Hospital itself seeking advice form the majority of this aspect of the Specialist Oncology Nurse and Staff Nurses’ time. This project was performed to assess the nature of these calls and the broad advice given to the callers so that a dedicated Acute Review Specialist Oncology Nurse Clinic could be developed.
Methods
In conjunction with key oncology nurses and their medical oncologist colleagues a log to capture each answered call was developed. This centred on the date and time of the call, the source, the issue raised, the advice given, if advised to go to the Emergency Room the reason why, and other actions that were necessary. A form was completed per answered call, and collected at the end of the day. Data was recorded on a spreadsheet. All forms were annonymised with regard to patient identifiers. The forms were focused on whether the issue was successfully addressed within the day unit, the Hospital’s emergency room, the community services, or whether solely by the advice given over the telephone.
Results
A sample size of 252 incoming answered calls by the Oncology Nursing Staff to the Nurses’ station was analysed. Just over half these calls (52%) were made by patients/family members. Other calls related to internal questions such as from Interventional Radiology or other diagnostic areas of the Hospital (26%), pharmacies (7%), and family doctors (4%). The other 11% of calls were mainly from wards relating to advice on inpatients or seeking consults. Of the unwell patients calling for advice, near half (48%) were seeking advice on what action to take: stay at home or come to Hospital. 35% of patients were seeking either a new appointment or change in appointment date. The remaining 17% of patients were seeking non-emergency review by the medical oncology team.
Conclusions
This analysis of answered calls highlights the need for involvement of experienced oncology nurses in the triage of phone calls to a busy oncology day unit, and the need to develop an Acute Review Clinic, managed by an experienced oncology nurse specialist.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Beaumont Hospital Cancer Centre.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1242 - Monalizumab in combination with cetuximab in patients (pts) with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) head and neck cancer (SCCHN) previously treated or not with PD-(L)1 inhibitors (IO): 1-year survival data.
Presenter: Roger Cohen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4703 - Updated results of a phase II study evaluating accelerator-based boron neutron capture therapy (AB-BNCT) with borofalan(10B) (SPM-011) in recurrent squamous cell carcinoma (R-SCC-HN) and recurrent and locally advanced non-SCC (R/LA-nSCC-HN) of the head and neck
Presenter: Katsumi Hirose
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3638 - Phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 Study of First-Line (1L) Pembrolizumab (P) for Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): Asia vs Non-Asia Subgroup (subgrp) Analysis
Presenter: Makoto Tahara
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2954 - Integrated data review evaluating safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and immunogenicity of RM-1929 photoimmunotherapy (PIT) in subjects with locoregional, recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (rHNSCC).
Presenter: Jennifer Johnson
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3629 - First line versus second line immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck
Presenter: Caroline Even
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
767 - Sensitizing HRAS overexpressing head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) to chemotherapy
Presenter: Theodoros Rampias
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4985 - A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase IIIb Clinical Trial with Nivolumab in Subjects with Recurrent or Metastatic Platinum-refractory Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.
Presenter: Paolo Bossi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1564 - Long-term Results of Phase 2 Trial of Reduced Modified Clinical Target Volume in Low-risk Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated with Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy
Presenter: Jingjing Miao
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3356 - To compare two oral mucosa contouring methods in predicting acute oral mucocitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with helical tomotherapy
Presenter: Yuan-Yuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1984 - Induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC)
Presenter: Gizem Kaval
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract