Abstract 1428
Background
HER2 blockade in combination with chemotherapy (CT) remains the treatment of choice for patients with early HER2+ BC, irrespective of ER status. Patients with HER2+ early BC co-expressing ER may benefit from HER2 blockade in combination with endocrine therapy (ET) and new targeted agents. Elderly patients benefit from HER2 blockade as much as younger ones but they have higher risks of adverse events, mostly induced by the CT partner, making de-escalation of CT appealing. Recent data have elucidated cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) as key therapeutic targets functioning downstream of both ER and HER2 pathways suggesting CDK4/6 inhibitors like Pal may be ideal partners for ET in this context. Pre-clinical and clinical data suggest that a gene signature of functional loss of Retinoblastoma (RBsig) might predict sensitivity to CT vs CDK4/6i in ER+/HER2+ early BC. The TOUCH hypothesis is that neoadjuvant therapy with Pal + ET + dual HER2 blockade may be more active in patients with ER+/HER2+ RBsig LOW early BC while those with RBsig HIGH may require CT.
Trial design
TOUCH is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 2 neoadjuvant trial. 144 patients ≥65 years with ER+/HER2+ primary BC will be randomized (1:1) to dual HER2 blockade (5 doses T+P) + either Pal (125 mg/d po; 21 of 28d x 4 cycles) + L (daily x 16 weeks), or Pac (80 mg/m2 iv, d1,8,15 q28 days x 4 cycles), before surgery. RBsig (HIGH vs LOW) will be determined centrally on mandatory pre-treatment biopsies. Baseline geriatric assessment includes G8, Instrumental Activity of Daily Living, Charlson comorbidity index. The primary objective is to explore the interaction between RBsig and treatment activity assessed by pathological complete response (pCR). Exact logistic regression will test RBsig by treatment interaction (2-sided a=.05) and estimate odds ratios (OR) for pCR. The sample size provides 86% power, assuming an overall pCR rate of 26%, and OR = 2.4 vs OR = 0.11 for RBsig LOW vs HIGH. Accrual began April 2019.
Clinical trial identification
NCT03644186.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
International Breast Cancer Study Group.
Funding
Pfizer, Roche.
Disclosure
L. Biganzoli: Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Celgene; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Genomic Health; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Ipsen; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Pierre Fabre; Advisory / Consultancy, consultant and in an advisory role: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Celgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Genomic Health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis. E. Brain: Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Roche; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: BMS; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Celgene; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Clinigen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Hospira; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Janssen; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Mylan; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: OBI Pharma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Puma; Honoraria (self), receipt of honoraria or consultation fees: Samsung. L. Malorni: Research grant / Funding (self), research funding and consulting fees: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3191 - The efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria of the phase 3 trial (REFLECT trial) and those with BCLC Stage B hepatocellular carcinoma - A nationwide multicenter study in Japan-
Presenter: Azusa Sakamoto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1529 - Prognostic and predictive value of baseline alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with ramucirumab from two phase 3 studies (REACH, REACH-2)
Presenter: Andrew Zhu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2767 - Effect of second-line cabozantinib on health states for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) after sorafenib: QTWiST analysis from the CELESTIAL study
Presenter: Nicholas Freemantle
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2150 - Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) response in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase 3 RESORCE trial
Presenter: Jordi Bruix
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3437 - Phase I/II trial of NBTXR3 activated by SBRT in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastasis
Presenter: Marc Pracht
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1758 - Efficacy and safety of ramucirumab (RAM) for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with elevated alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) following first-line sorafenib across age subgroups in two global phase 3 trials (REACH and REACH-2)
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1192 - Ramucirumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and elevated alpha fetoprotein (AFP): An exposure–response analysis
Presenter: Josep Llovet
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1600 - Outcomes of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) Patients Treated with Nivolumab: The Mount Sinai Hospital Experience.
Presenter: Sirish Dharmapuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2364 - Pembrolizumab vs Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced/Metastatic Adenocarcinoma (AC) or Squamous Cell Carcinoma (SCC) of the Esophagus as Second-Line Therapy: Analysis of the Chinese Subgroup in KEYNOTE-181
Presenter: Jia Chen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1933 - A national comparative effectiveness study to assess definitive chemoradiation regimens in proximal oesophageal squamous cell cancer
Presenter: Judith de Vos-Geelen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract