Abstract 1352
Background
The best use of bone targeted agents (BTAs), i.e. how patients (pts) profit most from treatment, optimal timing of treatment start and frequency of administration as well as duration of treatment is unclear to date.
Methods
Physicians were asked to indicate the criteria they use for the indication and administration of BTAs in pts with bone metastases from solid tumors in Switzerland (physician-related outcomes, PO) during a period of 3 months. Patterns of care (POC) was assessed by questions about reasons for BTA administration, treatment pattern, patient characteristics, and actual treatment. Pts completed a pain and bone-pain related quality of life questionnaire.
Results
PO: Most of the physicians reported to start treatment with BTAs according to current guidelines (70.9%, 61/86). A smaller proportion would first assess the risk (high vs low) for developing skeletal-related events (SREs) to decide about treatment initiation (24.4%, 21/86). Factors contributing to define high risk were former SREs (89.5%, 77/86), lytic bone metastases (87.2%, 75/86), and high burden of disease (67.4%, 58/86), respectively. POC: The majority of the pts have been treated with BTAs immediately after the diagnosis of bone metastases (73.6%, 307/417). The main reasons for treatment with BTAs were high risk of bone complications (43%, 132/307), bone pain (21.8%, 67/307), and location of bone metastases (10.1%, 31/307), respectively. Denosumab was the most frequently used BTA (78.5%; 241/307), and a 3-4 week interval was most common (88.9%; 273/307). SREs were reported in 8.5% of treated vs 7.3% of non-treated pts, and were similar in pts rated as low or as high risk (about 8%).
Conclusions
The majority of the pts was treated according to current guideline recommendations with regard to start and interval of BTA treatment. The number of SREs was low irrespective of BTA treatment or risk classification for SREs, which may reflect a high impact of systemic cancer treatment on SRE reduction, or a selection of the pts according to risk factors not defined as the ones in the literature.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
SAKK.
Funding
Amgen.
Disclosure
M.T. Mark: Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Advisory / Consultancy: Böhringer Ingelheim; Advisory / Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS. B.J.K. Thuerlimann: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. R. von Moos: Advisory / Consultancy: amgen; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1357 - Upfront atezolizumab chemoimmunotherapy-associated Immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Francis Mogollon-Duffo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1851 - Nivolumab-induced and radiation recall pneumonitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter real world analysis of 669 patients
Presenter: Nobuaki Mamesaya
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
851 - Retrospective analysis of immunotherapy prognostic scores in advanced NSCLC at Nottingham University Hospitals (UK)
Presenter: Cristina Lopez Escola
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3639 - Applicability of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) to predict efficacy of first-line pembrolizumab in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Xabier Mielgo Rubio
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2950 - Delayed Onset Immune Related Adverse Effects (IRAEs) of Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Presenter: Haixi Yan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3659 - Clinical implication of multiplex IHC and serologic biomarkers on Hyperprogression in NSCLC patients receiving Immune checkpoint blockers in real world.
Presenter: Joori Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4882 - Local ablative treatment and treatment beyond progression for oligo-progression in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer after tumor response to anti-PD1 treatment
Presenter: Florian Guisier
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1358 - Atezolizumab in combination with chemotherapy for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
Presenter: Francis Mogollon-Duffo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2170 - Prognostic Impact of Metastatic Sites for Pembrolizumab Efficacy as First-line therapy in Patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study
Presenter: Hayato Kawachi
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3051 - Impact of visceral fat area as independent predictive factor in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with nivolumab
Presenter: Yuki Sato
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract