Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
714 - The feasibility and efficacy of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for prevention of chemotherapy-induced ovarian insufficiency in patient with malignant ovarian germ cell tumors
Presenter: Min Kyu Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1753 - Ex vivo cytotoxicity and in vivo antitumor activity of a novel highly selective STAT3 inhibitor YHO-1701 for ovarian and endometrial cancer
Presenter: Kosei Hasegawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3739 - Mutational landscapes and tumor mutational burden expression in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Yingli Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2109 - Clinical features and frequency of mismatch repair protein deficiency in ovarian clear cell and endometrioid carcinoma patients.
Presenter: Kazuhiro Takehara
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4554 - Prospective study evaluating white adipose tissue inflammation and clinicopathologic features in endometrial cancer
Presenter: Lea Moukarzel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3645 - Cancer-specific survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I endometrial cancer
Presenter: Jenny Ko
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3394 - Pembrolizumab in Patients with MSI-H Advanced Endometrial Cancer from the KEYNOTE-158 Study
Presenter: David Omalley
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3388 - Who drops out of cervical cancer screening? Results from the EDIFICE 6 survey
Presenter: Thibault de La Motte Rouge
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2485 - Identification of a RNA-Seq Based Signature to Improve Prognostic for Uterine Sarcoma
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1049 - The Effect Of Multiple Interventions For Women At Risk For Cervical Cancer On Their Health Responsibility, Beliefs Regarding Cervical Cancer, And Having Screening: A Randomized Controlled Experiment
Presenter: Busra Altinel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract