Abstract 2642
Background
About 20% of breast cancer (BC) patients do not attain tamoxifen’s (TAM) active metabolite endoxifen (ENDX) target concentrations when receiving 20 mg TAM once daily (q.d.). Thus, individualised dosing of up to 120 mg TAM q.d. for ENDX target attainment (TA) has been proposed. Combining concentrations and antiestrogenic activities of ENDX and its 3 precursors, the antiestrogenic activity score (AAS) has been developed as alternative TA metric. We aimed to integrate experimental and clinical data from diverse sources in an innovative modelling approach to identify patient groups at risk of treatment failure and to assess whether ENDX- or AAS-guided dosing would be more favourable for TA applying in silico simulation.
Methods
In vitro data from enzyme kinetic experiments, pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters from previous clinical studies and in vivo data from three clinical trials were synthesised into a minimal nonlinear mixed-effects physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (NLME-PBPK) model. Using simulation, lowest doses needed for TA, applying either the ENDX (≥5.97 ng/mL) or the AAS (≥1798) threshold, were investigated in a representative virtual BC population with various CYP2D6 activity scores (AS) and age.
Results
The developed NLME-PBPK model captured individual TAM and 3 metabolite concentration profiles from 406 BC patients well. Bioactivation to ENDX was 4.5-fold higher in CYP2D6 normal (NM) than in poor metabolisers (PM). Patients with low CYP2D6 activity and young age showed highest risks for ENDX non-TA. Among all patients, 76% received the same dose irrespective of the TA metric used. For the remaining 23% with different dose selections, applying the AAS instead of the ENDX target, TA increased in NM and intermediate metabolisers (IM) (+21.7% and +6.9%, respectively), while TA decreased in PM (-11.7%).
Conclusions
Our modelling approach combined pharmacogenetic factors, physiological changes and variability on PK parameters in a quantitative manner and allowed to translate PK information on TAM and its three major metabolites into individualised dosing. While ENDX-guided dosing was preferable for PM in our simulation, AAS-guided dosing was superior for NM and IM.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
L. Klopp-Schulze: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. S.L. Koolen: Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Pfizer; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Ipsen. R.H.J. Mathijssen: Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Astellas; Research grant / Funding (institution): Bayer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Boehringer; Research grant / Funding (institution): Cristal Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pamgene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant / Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Kloft: Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: DDMoRe; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Industry consortium (AbbVie Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG, Gruenenthal GmbH, F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Merck KGaA and SANOFI); Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Federal Ministry of Education and Research; Research grant / Funding (institution), Grants received outside the submitted work: Diurnal Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4906 - Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A restrospective study
Presenter: Sara Giovannoni
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3919 - Prognostic significance of elements of the adaptive immunity in the microenvironment of epithelial ovarian cancer.
Presenter: Periklis Foukas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5139 - Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts platinum sensitivity in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: a MITO24 retrospective study
Presenter: Alberto Farolfi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4212 - The prognostic impact of monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)
Presenter: Marc Cucurull Salamero
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5123 - TP53 Hotspot mutations as immunoreactive neoantigens define a signature with differential survival outcomes in advanced ovarian cancer
Presenter: Marica Garziera
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3795 - Use of bevacizumab (Bev) in real life for first-line (fl) treatment of ovarian cancer (OC)/ The GINECO ENCOURAGE cohort of 500 French patients
Presenter: Dominique Berton-Rigaud
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2359 - Phase II study: Letrozole maintenance therapy after first line chemotherapy in patients with advanced serous and endometrioid ovarian cancer
Presenter: Alexandra Tyulyandina
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3619 - Baseline IPI (Immune Prognostic Index) predicts survival in patients with advanced cervical cancer treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI).
Presenter: Felix Blanc-Durand
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3474 - Preselecting tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte subsets to implement adoptive inmmunotherapy in ovarian cancer
Presenter: Diego Salas-Benito
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5134 - Early prediction of the platinum-resistant relapse risk using the CA125 modeled kinetic parameter KELIM: a pooled analysis of AGO-OVAR 7 & 9; ICON 7 (AGO/GINECO/ MRC CTU/GCIG trials).
Presenter: OLIVIER COLOMBAN
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract