Abstract 1947
Background
NEPA is the first and only fixed oral combination of a long-acting NK1receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3RA, palonosetron. NEPA is approved for prevention of chemotherapy (ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients (pts) receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic ctx (HEC) or moderately emetogenic ctx (MEC). Here we present patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of patients (pts) receiving NEPA as an antiemetic prophylaxis during platin-based chemotherapy in a prospective non-interventional study. This group of patients presents a population at high risk for CINV.
Methods
The ongoing prospective AkyPRO study was designed to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in 2500 pts receiving NEPA for CINV prevention in single or two-day MEC or HEC over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint QoL was recorded by FLIE questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were efficacy, reported by pts and physicians on a 4-point scale; antiemetic rescue medication, and safety.
Results
In this interims analysis 595 pts receiving platin-based ctx were evaluated. PRO data show that ctx-induced vomiting can be controlled very efficiently in the majority of platin-receiving pts. Between 80-90% of pts reported no impact on daily life due to vomiting and between 84-90% of pts had a complete response (no vomiting, no rescue medication) in the 3 analysed cycles, independently of which type of platin-ctx they received. Furthermore, the majority of pts (74%, 81% and 68%, respectively) reported no or mild nausea in the cisplatin-, carboplatin- and oxaliplatin-subgroup in cycle 1. However, even mild nausea seems to have a strong impact on daily life with 40% of pts receiving cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy and 46% of oxaliplatin-receiving pts reporting an impact on daily life due to nausea in cycle 1.
Conclusions
NEPA was proven highly effective in controlling both vomiting and nausea over three cycles of ctx independent of the type of platin administered. Despite the reported MEC classification of oxaliplatin in contrast to the HEC classification of cis- and carboplatin, nausea was more difficult to control in oxaliplatin-receiving patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Riemser Pharma.
Funding
Riemser Pharma.
Disclosure
M. Karthaus: Advisory / Consultancy: Helsinn; Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. J. Schilling: Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5054 - Inhibition of Rspo-Wnt pathway Facilitates Checkpoint Blockade Therapy by anti-RSPO3 antibody (DBPR117)
Presenter: John Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3305 - A phase I dose-escalation and expansion trial of intratumorally administered CV8102, alone and in combination with anti-PD-1 in patients with advanced solid tumors
Presenter: Jürgen Krauss
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5353 - Phase 1/2 Study of 9-ING-41, a small molecule selective Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 Beta (GSK-3β) Inhibitor, as a Single Agent and Combined with Chemotherapy, in Patients with Refractory Hematological Malignancies or Solid Tumors
Presenter: Benedito Carneiro
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3946 - Trial in progress: a Phase I, open-label study of GSK1795091 administered in combination with immunotherapies in participants with advanced solid tumors (NCT03447314).
Presenter: Aaron Hansen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3449 - Radiographic Phenotyping to Identify Intracranial Disseminated Recurrence in Brain metastases Treated With Radiosurgery Using Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging
Presenter: CheYu Hsu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4553 - Association between TP53 mutations and efficacy of Osimertinib for brain metastasis from EGFR-mutant lung cancer
Presenter: Lijuan Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4942 - Response assessment of melanoma brain metastases treated by stereotactic radiotherapy or immunotherapy or both: a comparison of RECIST 1.1, RANO and iRANO criteria
Presenter: Emilie Le Rhun
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3529 - Management of multiple brain metastases by Staged SRS focusing on utmost risk lesions
Presenter: shaoqun Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5315 - Whole brain radiotherapy plus simultaneous in-field boost versus whole brain radiotherapy plus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for multiple brain metastases of non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Lu Li
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1116 - 3D based texture analysis serving as potential diagnostic factor in discriminating primary central nervous system lymphoma from metastatic brain tumors: A preliminary study
Presenter: Wen Guo
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract