Abstract 1947
Background
NEPA is the first and only fixed oral combination of a long-acting NK1receptor antagonist (RA), netupitant, and a pharmacologically distinct 5-HT3RA, palonosetron. NEPA is approved for prevention of chemotherapy (ctx)-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients (pts) receiving cisplatin-based highly emetogenic ctx (HEC) or moderately emetogenic ctx (MEC). Here we present patient-reported outcomes (PRO) of patients (pts) receiving NEPA as an antiemetic prophylaxis during platin-based chemotherapy in a prospective non-interventional study. This group of patients presents a population at high risk for CINV.
Methods
The ongoing prospective AkyPRO study was designed to evaluate quality of life (QoL) in 2500 pts receiving NEPA for CINV prevention in single or two-day MEC or HEC over 3 cycles. The primary endpoint QoL was recorded by FLIE questionnaires. Secondary endpoints were efficacy, reported by pts and physicians on a 4-point scale; antiemetic rescue medication, and safety.
Results
In this interims analysis 595 pts receiving platin-based ctx were evaluated. PRO data show that ctx-induced vomiting can be controlled very efficiently in the majority of platin-receiving pts. Between 80-90% of pts reported no impact on daily life due to vomiting and between 84-90% of pts had a complete response (no vomiting, no rescue medication) in the 3 analysed cycles, independently of which type of platin-ctx they received. Furthermore, the majority of pts (74%, 81% and 68%, respectively) reported no or mild nausea in the cisplatin-, carboplatin- and oxaliplatin-subgroup in cycle 1. However, even mild nausea seems to have a strong impact on daily life with 40% of pts receiving cisplatin- or carboplatin-based chemotherapy and 46% of oxaliplatin-receiving pts reporting an impact on daily life due to nausea in cycle 1.
Conclusions
NEPA was proven highly effective in controlling both vomiting and nausea over three cycles of ctx independent of the type of platin administered. Despite the reported MEC classification of oxaliplatin in contrast to the HEC classification of cis- and carboplatin, nausea was more difficult to control in oxaliplatin-receiving patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Riemser Pharma.
Funding
Riemser Pharma.
Disclosure
M. Karthaus: Advisory / Consultancy: Helsinn; Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. J. Schilling: Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract