Abstract 3693
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has improves overall survival as compared to radical cystectomy (RC) alone. Our group has previously reported high risk features of MIBC that increase benefit of NAC. We report our institutional experience with NAC for patients with high-risk MIBC.
Methods
The records of consecutive high-risk, clinically node negative MIBC patients who underwent RC at our institution between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed. Pre-operative high-risk criteria included one or more of lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis, extravesical disease, and/or variant histology. Clinicopathologic and demographic information was collected, including eGFR and a previously validated frailty index. The primary outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR=pT0N0M0) and downstaging to In our cohort (n = 674), 74.3% (n = 501) of patients received any NAC, most commonly dose dense MVAC (39.3%, n = 265) followed by gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) (13.1%, n = 88), other cisplatin-based regimens (OCBR) (10.4%, n = 70), and non-cisplatin regimen (NCBR) (11.6%, n = 78) were used with similar frequency. The pCR rate was significantly lower without NAC at only 7.5% (n = 13, p < 0.01), while ddMVAC (30.2%, n = 80), GC (25%, n = 22), OCBR (25.7%, n = 18), and NCBR (23.1%, n = 18) all yielded similar results (p = 0.55). When controlling for age, baseline eGFR, frailty index, and clinical T stage the chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly predictive of achieving The benefits of NAC for MIBC have been repeatedly demonstrated, however, the rate of pathologic CR in high-risk muscle invasive disease has not been reported in a large series. In our high risk MIBC group, NAC led to significant higher pCR rate as compared to upfront surgery. These findings will serve as a benchmark for future neoadjuvant studies for evaluation of novel regimens. The authors. Has not received any funding. M.T. Campbell: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Apricity health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Merck. A.Y. Shah: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Oncology Information Group; Honoraria (self): Roche Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono. J. Gao: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. A.O. Siefker-Radtke: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Nektar Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic. C.P.N. Dinney: Advisory / Consultancy: FKD Therapies Oy; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): NCI; Research grant / Funding (self): The University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences (UEFHS). A.M. Kamat: Advisory / Consultancy: Photocure; Advisory / Consultancy: FKD; Advisory / Consultancy: Abbott Molecular; Advisory / Consultancy: Theralase; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: BioClin Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Cold Genesys; Advisory / Consultancy: Roviant; Advisory / Consultancy: Sessen Bio; Advisory / Consultancy: Asieris; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: US Biotest; Advisory / Consultancy: Ferring; Advisory / Consultancy: MDxHealth; Leadership role: IBCG; Advisory / Consultancy: TMC Innovation. N. Navai: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Allogene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pacira. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Results
Conclusions
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Funding
Disclosure
Resources from the same session
5105 - Fresh blood Immune cell monitoring in patients treated with nivolumab in the GETUG-AFU26 NIVOREN study: association with toxicity and treatment outcome
Presenter: Aude DESNOYER
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1877 - Advanced clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (accRCC): association of microRNAs (miRNAs) with molecular subtypes, mRNA targets and outcome.
Presenter: Annelies Verbiest
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5543 - Prior tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and antibiotics (ATB) use are associated with distinct gut microbiota ‘guilds’ in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients
Presenter: Valerio Iebba
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2689 - mTOR mutations are not associated with shorter PFS and OS in patients treated with mTOR inhibitors
Presenter: Cristina Suarez Rodriguez
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3069 - Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and genomic alterations by body mass index (BMI) in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Aly-Khan Lalani
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5089 - Finding the Right Biomarker for Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC): Nivolumab treatment induces the expression of specific peripheral lymphocyte microRNAs in patients with durable and complete response.
Presenter: Lorena Incorvaia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2594 - Algorithms derived from quantitative pathology can be a gatekeeper in patient selection for clinical trials in localised clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC)
Presenter: In Hwa Um
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2566 - High baseline blood volume is an independent favorable prognostic factor for overall and progression-free survival in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Aska Drljevic-nielsen
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2675 - Impact of estimand selection on adjuvant treatment outcomes in renal cell carcinoma (RCC)
Presenter: Daniel George
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1541 - TERT gene fusions characterize a subset of metastatic Leydig cell tumors
Presenter: Bozo Kruslin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract