Abstract 3693
Background
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with cisplatin-based chemotherapy for muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) has improves overall survival as compared to radical cystectomy (RC) alone. Our group has previously reported high risk features of MIBC that increase benefit of NAC. We report our institutional experience with NAC for patients with high-risk MIBC.
Methods
The records of consecutive high-risk, clinically node negative MIBC patients who underwent RC at our institution between 2005 and 2017 were reviewed. Pre-operative high-risk criteria included one or more of lymphovascular invasion, hydronephrosis, extravesical disease, and/or variant histology. Clinicopathologic and demographic information was collected, including eGFR and a previously validated frailty index. The primary outcomes were pathologic complete response (pCR=pT0N0M0) and downstaging to In our cohort (n = 674), 74.3% (n = 501) of patients received any NAC, most commonly dose dense MVAC (39.3%, n = 265) followed by gemcitabine/cisplatin (GC) (13.1%, n = 88), other cisplatin-based regimens (OCBR) (10.4%, n = 70), and non-cisplatin regimen (NCBR) (11.6%, n = 78) were used with similar frequency. The pCR rate was significantly lower without NAC at only 7.5% (n = 13, p < 0.01), while ddMVAC (30.2%, n = 80), GC (25%, n = 22), OCBR (25.7%, n = 18), and NCBR (23.1%, n = 18) all yielded similar results (p = 0.55). When controlling for age, baseline eGFR, frailty index, and clinical T stage the chemotherapeutic regimen was not significantly predictive of achieving The benefits of NAC for MIBC have been repeatedly demonstrated, however, the rate of pathologic CR in high-risk muscle invasive disease has not been reported in a large series. In our high risk MIBC group, NAC led to significant higher pCR rate as compared to upfront surgery. These findings will serve as a benchmark for future neoadjuvant studies for evaluation of novel regimens. The authors. Has not received any funding. M.T. Campbell: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Genentech; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: Apricity health; Research grant / Funding (institution): Exelixis; Research grant / Funding (institution): Janssen; Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche; Non-remunerated activity/ies: Merck. A.Y. Shah: Honoraria (self), Research grant / Funding (institution): Eisai; Honoraria (self): Oncology Information Group; Honoraria (self): Roche Pharmaceuticals; Research grant / Funding (institution): BMS; Research grant / Funding (institution): EMD Serono. J. Gao: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: AstraZeneca. A.O. Siefker-Radtke: Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sharp & Dohme; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Nektar Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Seattle Genetics; Advisory / Consultancy: Bavarian Nordic. C.P.N. Dinney: Advisory / Consultancy: FKD Therapies Oy; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen; Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self): NCI; Research grant / Funding (self): The University of Eastern Finland, Faculty of Health Sciences (UEFHS). A.M. Kamat: Advisory / Consultancy: Photocure; Advisory / Consultancy: FKD; Advisory / Consultancy: Abbott Molecular; Advisory / Consultancy: Theralase; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: BioClin Therapeutics; Advisory / Consultancy: Cold Genesys; Advisory / Consultancy: Roviant; Advisory / Consultancy: Sessen Bio; Advisory / Consultancy: Asieris; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory / Consultancy: US Biotest; Advisory / Consultancy: Ferring; Advisory / Consultancy: MDxHealth; Leadership role: IBCG; Advisory / Consultancy: TMC Innovation. N. Navai: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Allogene; Research grant / Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant / Funding (institution): Pacira. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.Results
Conclusions
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Funding
Disclosure
Resources from the same session
3630 - Results of phase 1 clinical trial of high doses of Seleno-L-methionine (SLM) in sequential combination with Axitinib in previously treated and relapsed clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC) patients
Presenter: Yousef Zakharia
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2356 - Safety and Efficacy of CDX-014 , an Antibody-Drug Conjugate against T Cell immunoglobulin mucin-1 (TIM-1), in advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1028 - SPAZO2 (SOGUG): Outcomes and prognostic significance of IMDC intermediate prognosis subclassification in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in patients treated with 1st-line pazopanib (1stPz).
Presenter: Begona P. Valderrama
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2293 - Effect of Antacid Intake on the Therapeutic Efficacy of Sunitinib (SUN) in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC) Patients (pts): a Sub-Analysis of the STAR-TOR Registry
Presenter: Katrin Schlack
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1451 - Randomized phase 3 trial of avelumab + axitinib vs sunitinib as first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: JAVELIN Renal 101 Japanese subgroup analysis
Presenter: Motohide Uemura
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4399 - Overall and progression-free survival according to MSKCC scores in 1st line sunitinib treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Jindrich Finek
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1344 - Combination therapy with checkpoint inhibitors for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3462 - A phase II trial of TKI induction followed by a randomized comparison between nivolumab or TKI continuation in renal cell carcinoma (NIVOSWITCH)
Presenter: Viktor Grünwald
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
5268 - Nivolumab (N) treatment beyond progression in a real-world cohort of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC)
Presenter: Sophie Hans
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4235 - First results of safety profile of nivolumab (NIVO) in combination with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in II and III line of patients (pts) with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in NIVES Study
Presenter: Cristina Masini
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract