Abstract 4399
Background
Data on the efficacy and safety of all targeted therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) including sunitinib are collected in the Czech RENIS patient registry. RENIS thus provides a uniquely large sample of long-term effectiveness and prognostic data of sunitinib according to adverse/risk factors measured by the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score. The aim of this study was to analyze the long-term overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of sunitinib, when used as 1st line treatment, based on MSKCC risk group scores including MSKCC scores for two intermediate subgroups.
Methods
Data from mRCC patients treated using sunitinib in the 1st line were collected in RENIS between 06/2007 and 02/2018. OS/PFS were then stratified based on MSKCC scores: a) favorable risk (0 adverse factors (AF)), b) intermediate risk (pooled 1–2 AFs), and c) poor risk (3+ AFs). The OS/PFS of the intermediate risk group was further stratified into two subgroups: i) 1 AF and ii) 2 AFs. All OS/PFS data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Differences in OS/PFS between risk groups were assessed using median survival, 95% confidence intervals (CI), and the log-rank test. Then we assessed the OS/PFS for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival.
Results
Over the 11-year follow-up, 2390 patients were treated using sunitinib with 806, 1450, and 134 patients in the favorable, intermediate, and poor MSKCC risk groups. The more favorable MSKCC risk group was accompanied by an improved OS and PFS (p < 0.001). Regarding the MSKCC for the two intermediate sub-groups, 1 AF was associated with improved survival compared to 2 AFs (p < 0.001) (Table).Table:
957P OS and PFS results for sunitinib treatment based on MSKCC risk groups
MSKCC favorable | MSKCC intermediate | MSKCC poor | MSKCC intermediate | All patients | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 AF | 2 AFs | |||||
Overall survival | ||||||
Median survival (95% CI) | 44.7months (40.9-50.5) | 24.1months (21.9-26.0) | 9.5months (7.2-14.1) | 28.2months (25.9-30.7) | 16.2months (14.5-20.2) | 28.5months (26.3-30.5) |
1-year survival (95% CI) | 85.0% (82.4-87.6) | 69.1% (66.6-71.7) | 44.3% (35.0-53.7) | 74.3% (71.4-77.2) | 58.0% (53.1-62.9) | 73.3% (71.4-75.2) |
3-year survival (95 %CI) | 57.3% (53.4-61.3) | 37.1% (34.1-40.1) | 9.6% (3.1-16.2) | 42.0% (38.3-45.7) | 26.3% (21.4-31.2) | 42.9% (40.5-45.2) |
5-year survival (95% CI) | 35.6% (31.2-40.1) | 23.4% (20.4-26.4) | 3.2% (0.0-8.8) | 26.5% (22.7-30.3) | 16.5% (11.8-21.2) | 26.8% (24.3-29.2) |
n | 806 | 1450 | 134 | 969 | 481 | 2390 |
Log-rank p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | - | |||
Progression-free survival | ||||||
Median survival (95% CI) | 17.0months (15.4-18.8) | 9.0months (8.3-9.5) | 4.5months (3.9-6.1) | 10.1months (9.4-11.4) | 6.2months (5.5-7.5) | 10.6months (9.9-11.5) |
1-year survival (95% CI) | 61.8% (58.3-65.3) | 40.7% (38.0-43.4) | 20.8% (13.1-28.5) | 45.1% (41.8-48.4) | 31.6% (27.1-36.1) | 46.9% (44.7-49.0) |
3-year survival (95 %CI) | 25.1% (21.7-28.5) | 13.0% (11.0-15.1) | 1.8% (0.0-5.1) | 15.9% (13.2-18.6) | 7.0% (4.2-9.7) | 16.6% (14.9-18.4) |
5-year survival (95% CI) | 10.4% (7.7-13.2) | 8.0% (6.2-9.8) | 1.8% (0.0-5.1) | 9.7 (7.3-12.0) | 4.5% (2.1-6.9) | 8.4% (7.0-9.9) |
n | 806 | 1450 | 134 | 969 | 481 | 2390 |
Log-rank p-value | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | - |
Conclusions
Better MSKCC risk scores were associated with significantly longer OS and PFS. To our knowledge, this is the largest published sunitinib mRCC cohort described relative to MSKCC risk groups.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
J. Finek: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Teva; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Pierre Fabre. A. Poprach: Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Bayer. B. Melichar: Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Astellas Pharma; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Bayer. J. Kopecky: Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer. M. Zemanova: Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: MSD; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim. T. Buchler: Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Janssen. K. Kopeckova: Honoraria (self): Novartis; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Bayer; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Pfizer. T. Mlcoch: Full / Part-time employment: Value Outcomes. T. Dolezal: Full / Part-time employment: Value Outcomes. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2673 - Clinical activity of vofatamab (V), an FGFR3 selective antibody in combination with pembrolizumab (P) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), updated interim analysis of FIERCE-22
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2600 - Atezolizumab (atezo) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in patients (pts) with platinum-treated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC): a long-term overall survival (OS) and safety update from the Phase III IMvigor211 study
Presenter: Michiel Van der Heijden
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3598 - Three-Year Follow-Up From the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-045 Trial: Pembrolizumab (Pembro) Versus Investigator’s Choice (Paclitaxel, Docetaxel, or Vinflunine) in Recurrent, Advanced Urothelial Cancer (UC)
Presenter: Andrea Necchi
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2382 - First Report of Efficacy and Safety From a Phase 2 Trial of Tislelizumab, an Anti-PD-1 Antibody, for the Treatment of PD-L1+ Locally Advanced or Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma (UC) in Asian Patients
Presenter: Dingwei Ye
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2388 - Quality of Life of Metastatic Urothelial Cancer (mUC) Patients Treated with Enfortumab Vedotin (EV) Following Platinum-Containing Chemotherapy and a Checkpoint Inhibitor (CPI): Data from EV-201 Cohort 1
Presenter: Bradley McGregor
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3748 - Safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) in patients (pts) with autoimmune disease (AID): subgroup analysis of the SAUL study in locally advanced/metastatic urinary tract carcinoma
Presenter: Yohann Loriot
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1126 - Validation of the VIO prognostic index in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Rafael Morales Barrera
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3693 - Pathologic outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer
Presenter: Justin Matulay
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4840 - Analysis of response to prior therapies and therapies after treatment with erdafitinib in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)-positive patients (pts) with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Arlene Siefker-Radtke
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1221 - Clinical outcomes by sex with atezolizumab (atezo) monotherapy in patients (pts) with locally advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC)
Presenter: Jean Hoffman-censits
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract