Abstract 4217
Background
ieCTs historically excluded HGG patients (pts) due to unavailability of serial bioptic sampling, use of corticosteroids, concerns on activity of immunotherapy in central nervous system, and rapid clinical deterioration.
Methods
Data of all recurrent HGG pts enrolled into ieCTs at the Humanitas Cancer Center Phase I Unit between 2014 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Disease control rate (DCR) according to RANO criteria, six-months progression-free and overall survival (PFS-6; OS-6), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), were evaluated. A control-cohort (CC) of patients treated with standard therapies (temozolomide, fotemustine, lomustine and procarbazine, bevacizumab) matched (1:1) for sex, age, line of treatment, MGMT methylation status, and IDH mutational status, was selected for comparison. A huge series of clinical and laboratory variables with an established prognostic relevance for solid tumors pts treated into ieCTs were studied through univariate analysis.
Results
Only 5 out 23 ieCTs allowed inclusion of HGG pts. The experimental cohort (EC) consisted of 25 pts (M/F: 16/9; median age: 50 years): 22 (88%) glioblastoma, 3 (12%) anaplastic astrocytoma. 17 pts (68%) required steroid therapy, with a median baseline dexamethasone dose of 2 mg (range 1-6). The median number of prior systemic therapies was 1 (range 1-2). 12 pts (48%) received monotherapies (anti PD-1, anti CSFR-1, anti TGF-ß, anti cereblon), 13 (52%) combination regimens (anti PD-L1 + anti CD38, anti PD-1 + anti CSFR-1). DCR was 40% in both EC (1 CR + 2 PR + 7 SD) and CC (1 PR + 9 SD). 4 pts (16%) in EC had grade ≥3 TRAEs (1 neutropenia, 1 pneumonia, 2 hepatitis). With a median follow-up (FU) of 14 months PFS-6 were 35% and 16% (p = 0.075), in EC and CC respectively, while OS-6 was significantly improved in the EC (82% vs 44%, p = 0.004). With limitations due to small sample size, short FU and few events recorded, none of the parameters analyzed resulted prognostic.
Conclusions
Survival of our HGG pts treated into ieCTs compared favorably with a matched CC. Inclusion of HGGs pts into ieCTs should be encouraged. Clinical selection factors predicting which pts may benefit most still lack.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
M. Simonelli: Advisory / Consultancy: AbbVie. A. Santoro: Advisory / Consultancy: BRISTOL-MYERS-SQUIBB; Advisory / Consultancy: SERVIER; Advisory / Consultancy: GILEAD; Advisory / Consultancy: EISAI; Advisory / Consultancy: BAYER; Advisory / Consultancy: MERCK SHARP & DOHME; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: TAKEDA; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: BRISTOL-MYERS-SQUIBB; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ROCHE; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ABBVIE; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: AMGEN; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: CELGENE; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SERVIER; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: GILEAD; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ASTRAZENECA; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: PFIZER; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: ARQULE; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: LILLY; Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: SANDOZ; Advisory / Consultancy: PFIZER. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4294 - The Patient Voice: An Irish Survey of Nutrition Attitudes & Access to Dietetic Care Throughout the Cancer Journey
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
1925 - Homcology: home chemotherapy delivery in a simultaneous care project for frail advanced cancer patients
Presenter: Claudio Chini
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
4701 - Treatment-related adverse events and tolerability in patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy
Presenter: Ruth D'cunha
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2985 - Clinical utility of a systematic toxicity assessment form (STAF) in patients with breast cancer receiving adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy.
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2358 - Physicians’ satisfaction with Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) assessment in daily clinical practice using electronic patient-reported outcome (ePRO) for cancer patients.
Presenter: Guillaume Mouillet
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5172 - Predictors of Survival in Patients with Incurable Cancer
Presenter: Erin Stella Sullivan
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2281 - Patients and Physicians' Satisfaction with Telemedicine (TM) in Cancer Care and Factors that Correlate with a Positive Patient’s Experience
Presenter: Hurria Gondal
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2193 - Adherence to ESMO 2014 guidelines on bone-targeting agent (BTA) initiation for breast and prostate cancer patients: real-world insights from practicing European physicians
Presenter: Alex Rider
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2200 - Use of skeletal-related events preventive agents in patients with solid tumours and bone metastases in central Denmark
Presenter: Anders Boysen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2504 - Inadequacy of current definition and staging system of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of Jaw (MRONJ) released by AAOMS : a Computed Tomography study in 151 cancer and myeloma patients
Presenter: Vittorio Fusco
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract