Abstract 2589
Background
Cetuximab (CET) in combination with chemotherapy is approved for a once-weekly (q1w) schedule at an initial dose of 400 mg/m², followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m², in patients with RAS wild-type (wt) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However in clinical practice, an off-label schedule of CET 500 mg/m2 every-2-weeks (q2w) is frequently used. This pooled analysis of patient-level data aimed to test the noninferiority of the q2w vs q1w schedule on overall survival (OS).
Methods
All post-authorization studies with patient-level data available to marketing authorization holder at time of study design, in patients with confirmed RAS wt mCRC who received a first-line treatment with CET q1w or q2w in combination with chemotherapy from 2007 to 2018 were included: 2 non-interventional cohort studies (NIS) (EREBUS, ERBITAG) and 3 clinical trials (CEBIFOX, CECOG/CORE 1.2.002, APEC). Patients were categorized into q1w or q2w groups according to the CET schedule planned at initiation. OS was calculated from first CET infusion until all-cause death and censored at the last date patients were known to be alive. The noninferiority of the q2w vs q1w schedule was tested with a hazard ratio (HR) margin of 1.25 using a Cox proportional hazards regression model. Differences in baseline characteristics were accounted for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) based on a propensity score.
Results
763 (91% from NIS) and 554 (51% from NIS) patients were included in the q1w and q2w groups, respectively. Median (Q1-Q3) age in years was 66 (57-73) for q1w and 60 (53-69) for q2w. Liver-limited disease concerned 42.6% of patients for q1w and 37.9% for q2w. A baseline ECOG Performance Status of 0-1 was reported in 81.8% of q1w and 90.6% of q2w patients. FOLFIRI was most frequently used in combination with q1w (49.4%) and FOLFOX with q2w (59.2%). IPTW-adjusted HRs for OS were in favor of q2w: 0.83 (95% CI, 0.71-0.96) and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.61-0.88) when restricted to NIS. Other efficacy and safety results will be presented in the future.
Conclusions
This pooled analysis confirmed the noninferiority of CET q2w vs q1w. This result suggests an improved OS with the q2w schedule.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
ClinicalThinking, Inc, Hamilton, NJ, USA, funded by Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Funding
Merck Healthcare KGaA.
Disclosure
S. Kasper: Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Merck; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Aventis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Servier; Honoraria (self), Honoraria (institution), Advisory / Consultancy, Research grant / Funding (self), Research grant / Funding (institution), Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Lilly. F. Overkamp: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Chugai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Celgene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Cellex; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Hexal; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Janssen-Cilag; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novonordisc; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Riemser; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Servier. C. Foch: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. F. Lamy: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. R. Esser: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Healthcare KGaA. D. Messinger: Full / Part-time employment, Prometris provides statistical services for Merck Healthcare KGaA: Merck Healthcare KGaA. V. Rothe: Full / Part-time employment, Prometris provides statistical services for Merck Healthcare KGaA: Merck Healthcare KGaA. W. Chen: Full / Part-time employment: Merck Serono. T. Brodowicz: Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Amgen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Bayer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: PharmaMar; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Eisai; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly. C.C. Zielinski: Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Imugene; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: ARIAD; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merrimack; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Merck Healthcare KGaA; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: FibroGen; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Tesaro; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Gilead; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Servier; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Shire; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Lilly; Honoraria (self), Advisory / Consultancy: Athenex. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5747 - The routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high risk DCIS lesions is not justified
Presenter: Fanny Preat
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1837 - Oncological impact of re-excision for positive margin status after breast conserving surgery in invasive breast cancer
Presenter: Kenjiro Jimbo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4347 - Pneumonitis and fibrosis after breast cancer radiation.
Presenter: Jarle Karlsen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2280 - Prognosis of mastectomy with reconstruction after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a nationwide study in Korean Breast Cancer Society
Presenter: Sungmin Park
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
804 - A negative prognosis of radiotherapy-induced lower lymphocyte to monocyte ratio in patients with breast cancer
Presenter: Chang-ik Yoon
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2701 - Patient data to monitor clinical patterns in early and advanced breast cancer in Europe
Presenter: Francesco Giusti
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1437 - A critical appraisal of quality indicators of breast cancer treatment in Belgium
Presenter: Didier Verhoeven
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1534 - Predictors of adherence among post-menopausal women receiving adjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer in Ontario, Canada
Presenter: Phillip Blanchette
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4363 - Evaluation of endocrine therapy and patients preferences in early breast cancer: results of Elena study
Presenter: Emilia Montagna
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2679 - Baseline Quality of life (QoL) and chemotherapy related toxicities (CRT) in localized breast cancer (BC) patients (pts): the French multicentric prospective CANTO cohort study
Presenter: Idlir Licaj
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract