Abstract 4878
Background
CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80405 was a randomized phase III trial that found no difference in overall survival (OS) in first-line mCRC Patients (pts) treated with bevacizumab (Bev) or cetuximab (Cet) combined with the same chemotherapy. By applying NGS to tumour DNA collected from pts in the trial, we aimed to discover novel mutated genes associated with differential response to therapy with the biologics and prognosis.
Methods
Primary tumour DNA from 520 pts was profiled for somatic gene mutations. Mutations in 426 genes were determined by NGS (FoundationOne). OS was the primary endpoint, both as a time-to-event and a categorical (<20 or ≥ 20 months) variable. Cox proportional hazard models (hazard ratio, HR) and logistic regression (odds ratio, OR) were used, respectively, adjusted by MSI status, BRAF V600E, all RAS mutations, arm, gender, and age. Interactions between mutated genes and treatment (Bev versus Cet) on OS were tested.
Results
In Bev-treated pts, tumours with mutated IGF1 (6%) conferred worse OS than WT tumours (HR 2.8 [1.5-5.2], p = 0.0009), and tumours with mutated KDR (11%) conferred worse OS than WT tumours (OR 4.4 [1.6-12.3], p = 0.004). In Cet-treated pts, tumours with mutated FANCD2 (6%) conferred worse OS than WT tumours (HR 2.7 [1.4-5.3], p = 0.004), and tumours with mutated APC (74%) conferred better OS than WT tumours (OR 0.3 [0.1-0.6], p = 0.0009). RNF43-mutated tumours (12%) and SMARCA4-mutated tumours (6%) conferred worse OS in Cet-treated pts than Bev-treated pts (interaction p-value 0.002 and 0.0009, respectively). In all patients in the study, FANCI-mutated tumours (4%) conferred worse OS than WT tumours (HR 2.0 [1.2-3.3], p = 0.005; OR 5.0 [1.9-14.8], p = 0.002). The full set of NGS results will be presented, including the mutational map of tumour location.
Conclusions
To our knowledge, this is the largest and most comprehensive NGS analysis of somatic DNA mutations in tumours from mCRC pts treated with standard of care therapy. It provides novel gene candidates affecting response to Bev and Cet, each combined with chemotherapy, as well as mutated genes affecting the prognosis of patients. If validated in other phase III studies, these results may be used to guide treatment decisions in pts with mCRC.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00265850.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U10CA180888 and U10CA180830 (SWOG); Genentech, Eli Lilly & Co., Pfizer, Sanofi.
Disclosure
X. Qu: Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options, Full / Part-time employment: Genentech. M. Bertagnolli: Research grant / Funding (self): BMS; Research grant / Funding (self): Eli Lilly; Research grant / Funding (self): Roche; Research grant / Funding (self): Sanofi; Research grant / Funding (self): Pfizer; Research grant / Funding (self): Genentech. A. Venook: Research grant / Funding (self), travel: Genentech; Research grant / Funding (self): BMS; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. O. Kabbarah: Full / Part-time employment: Genentech; Shareholder / Stockholder / Stock options: Roche. H.J. Lenz: Honoraria (self): Roche; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
LBA32 - Encorafenib plus Cetuximab With or Without Binimetinib for BRAF V600E–Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Expanded Results from a Randomized, 3-Arm, Phase III Study vs. the Choice of Either Irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus Cetuximab (BEACON CRC)
Presenter: Josep Tabernero
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
5016 - Lefitolimod vs standard of care (SOC) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) responding to first-line standard treatment: Results from the randomized phase 3 IMPALA trial
Presenter: Ramon Salazar
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA32, LBA33 and 524O
Presenter: Alfredo Falcone
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
1890 - MIRACLE: Green tea extract versus placebo for the prevention of colorectal adenomas: a randomized, controlled trial
Presenter: Thomas Seufferlein
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal - Invited Discussant LBA34
Presenter: Andrew Chan
Session: Proffered Paper 2 – Gastrointestinal tumours, colorectal
Resources:
Slides
Webcast