Abstract 1518
Background
The PORTEC-3 trial investigated the benefit of combined adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (CTRT) versus radiotherapy alone (RT) for women with stage I-III endometrial cancer with high-risk features (HREC). Since the TCGA defined 4 molecular subgroups of EC with strong prognostic value, we investigated outcomes and impact of chemotherapy for each molecular subgroup using tissue samples from PORTEC-3 trial participants.
Methods
Paraffin-embedded tissues of 423 consenting patients (64% of 660) were collected. Immunohistochemistry for p53 and mismatch repair (MMR) proteins, and DNA sequencing for POLE pathogenic exonuclease domain mutations were done to classify tumours as p53 mutant staining (p53abn), POLE ultramutated (POLEmut), MMR deficient (MMRd), or no specific molecular profile (NSMP). The Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox model were used for analysis.
Results
Molecular analysis was successful in 410 HREC (97%), identifying the four subgroups; p53abn (n = 92, 22%), POLEmut (n = 52, 13%), MMRd (n = 137, 33%) and NSMP (n = 129, 32%). Five-year recurrence free survival (RFS) was 50% for patients with p53abn HREC, 98% for POLEmut, 74% for MMRd and 76% for NSMP (p < 0.0001). Patients with p53abn HREC significantly benefited from combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy (5-year RFS with CTRT 61% versus 37% for RT, log-rank p = 0.015, Table 1). In contrast, POLEmut-HREC had 97-100% survival in both trial arms, and 5-year RFS for MMRd-HREC was 72 vs 76% for CTRT vs RT.Table: LBA63
Recurrence-free survival by molecular subgroup
Events | 5-year estimate % | HR (95% CI) | P value of HR | |
---|---|---|---|---|
p53abn EC | ||||
RT | 28 | 37,2 | 1 | |
CTRT | 20 | 61,1 | 0,50 (0,28-0,88) | 0,017 |
POLEmut EC | ||||
RT | 1 | 96,6 | 1 | |
CTRT | 0 | 100 | 0,02 (<0,01->104) | 0,632 |
MMRd EC | ||||
RT | 17 | 75,8 | 1 | |
CTRT | 18 | 72,4 | 1,15 (0,59-2,22) | 0,687 |
NSMP EC | ||||
RT | 19 | 68,9 | 1 | |
CTRT | 17 | 81,2 | 0,71 (0,37-1,37) | 0,311 |
Conclusions
Molecular EC classification has a strong prognostic value in HREC and better identifies those who benefit from adjuvant CTRT than clinicopathological factors. Patients with p53abn HREC had significantly improved RFS with adjuvant CTRT, while those with MMRd did not seem to benefit from chemotherapy. Patients with POLEmut HREC had an excellent RFS in both arms. Future trials should incorporate the molecular classification and target specific subgroups.
Clinical trial identification
NCT00411138.
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Leiden University Medical Center.
Funding
Koningin Wilhelmina Fonds voor de Nederlandse Kankerbestrijding (KWF).
Disclosure
A. Leary: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses, Officer / Board of Directors: AZ; Officer / Board of Directors: Tesaro; Officer / Board of Directors: Clovis; Officer / Board of Directors: MSD; Officer / Board of Directors: Grisdstone; Officer / Board of Directors: Seattle Genetics; Officer / Board of Directors: Gamamabs; Officer / Board of Directors: Biocad; Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche . H.W. Nijman: Leadership role, Founder: SME Vicinivax; Advisory / Consultancy: Aduro; Advisory / Consultancy: TRON ; Advisory / Consultancy: Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4350 - Time to second progression (PFS2) and second subsequent therapy (TSST) for patients (pts) with newly diagnosed, advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm) treated with maintenance (mt) olaparib (ola) – Phase III SOLO1 trial
Presenter: Ana Oaknin
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
2325 - Patient-centred outcomes with maintenance olaparib in newly diagnosed patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and a BRCA mutation (BRCAm) in the Phase III SOLO1 trial to support the clinical benefit of prolongation of progression-free survival (PFS)
Presenter: Michael Friedlander
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
2019 - Validation of the Geriatric Vulnerability Score (GVS) in older ovarian cancer (oOC) patients: an analysis from the GCIG-ENGOT-GINECO EWOC-1 study
Presenter: Fabian Tinquaut
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
4563 - Phase II study of olaparib + durvalumab (MEDIOLA): Updated results in germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed (PSR) ovarian cancer (OC)
Presenter: Yvette Drew
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
4592 - Analysis of tumor samples from SOLO1: frequency of BRCA specific loss of heterozygosity (LOH) and progression-free survival (PFS) according to homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRD)-LOH score
Presenter: Charlie Gourley
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
4751 - Immune-related gene expression signatures (irGES) in patients (pts) with ovarian clear cell carcinomas (OCCC) – a multicenter analysis
Presenter: Valerie Heong
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers - Invited Discussant 995PD, 996PD, 997PD and 1190PD
Presenter: Sven Mahner
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers - Invited Discussant 998PD, 999PD and one LBA63
Presenter: Robert Coleman
Session: Poster Discussion – Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Slides
Webcast