Abstract 5117
Background
Monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio are considered prognostic tools of overall survival (OS) in several hematologic and solid tumors. All these elements have been implicated as biomarkers of tumor microenvironment and immune homeostasis. Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a relatively uncommon subtype of lymphoid malignancy (5%–7% of malignant lymphoma) but could be very aggressive. Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) is the only validated prognostic tool for these patients. The aim of this study assessed the prognostic significance of monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratio as prognostic biomarkers for MCL.
Methods
An observational retrospective study was conducted and included a total all the patients diagnosed with MCL between 2008-2018 in our hematologic center. The ratios were calculated, and statistical analysis were assessed using Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test and Cox regression. All the analyses were performed using SPSS.
Results
A total of 52 patients were included, 75% were male, with the median age at diagnosis being 67 years-old (max 94, min 36 years old). 77% of the patients had an ECOG PS 0-1, 67% had a high risk MIPI and 73% were a stage IV disease at diagnosis. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that MIPI score significantly predicts the OS of the patients, with the higher scores being associated with inferior OS (p = 0,02). The same did not happen with the monocyte-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0,5), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0,4) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (p = 0,3). The same results were showed in cox regression, MIPI score remained the only score associated with OS (HR, 0,35; 95% CI 0,132-0,962).
Conclusions
In conclusion, this study fails to identify monocyte-lymphocyte, neutrophil-lymphocyte and platelet-lymphocyte ratios as prognostic tools and support MIPI as predictor of the survival outcome in MCL patients and its ability to identify high-risk patients.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4228 - Clinical Evaluation of Drug-Eluting Bead Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization(D-TACE) versus Conventional TACE in Treatment of unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Presenter: Yi Chen
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
3930 - Safety profile of tepotinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: pooled analysis of phase I and II data
Presenter: Thomas Decaens
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5373 - Drug-drug interaction profile of tepotinib with CYP3A and P-gp substrates
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5455 - Bioavailability of tepotinib: impact of omeprazole and food
Presenter: Juergen Heuer
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2618 - Tislelizumab Exposure-Response Analyses of Efficacy and Safety in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2563 - Population Pharmacokinetics of Tislelizumab in Patients with Advanced Tumors
Presenter: Chi-Yuan Wu
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
2021 - The Addition of Metformin to Systemic Anticancer Therapy
Presenter: Jung Han Kim
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5243 - Growth modulation index (GMI) as a comparative measure of clinical activity of larotrectinib versus prior systemic treatments in adult and pediatric TRK fusion cancer patients
Presenter: Antoine Italiano
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
598 - Analysis of the overall survival and main surrogates used for FDA approvals in solid and hematological malignancies.
Presenter: Maria Kleniewska-Wieczor
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract
5381 - Comparison of intratumoral docetaxel exposure in cancer patients between nanoparticle entrapped docetaxel (CPC634) and conventional docetaxel (Cd): the CriTax study
Presenter: Ruben Van Eerden
Session: Poster Display session 1
Resources:
Abstract