Abstract 5442
Background
HER2-targeted therapy was a paradigm shift for breast cancer. However, the optimal duration of adjuvant trastuzumab remain unknown. This issue is important in lower and middle-income countries such as Brazil where financial resources are scarce. The aim of this study is to determine which patients will benefit most with the addition of Pertuzumab to trastuzumab [T+P], trastuzumab for 12 months [T12] or trastuzumab for 6 months [T6].
Methods
Individual data meta-analysis was performed using 5 studies (Persephone, Phare, Horg, Aphinity and Katherine) for the intention to treat (ITT) population. Through pooled analyzes of the Persephone, Phare and Horg studies, we compared 12 months and 6 months of trastuzumab. The comparison between T+P and T6 was performed through an indirect comparison using Bayesian methodology. For cost-effectiveness analysis, we compared the treatment lining up in pairs exclusively considering the data from the Aphinity (T+P vs T12), Persephone (T12 vs T6) and Katherine (T12 vs T-DM1), setting a 30 years period of time and costs of adjuvant treatments and after progression in the Brazilian perspective.
Results
Individual data were analyzed from 12,753 patients. Patients who progressed in a 4-year period were 7.1% for T + P, 10.2% for T12 (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.16-1.63) and 12.9% for T6 (HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.45-2.06). Regarding DFS in the N+ subgroup, T+P showed HR 0.77 (95% CI 0.62-0.96) and 0.74 (95% CI 0.49-1.11) compared to T12 and T6, respectively. Among patients N-, T+P compared to T12 showed a HR 1.13 (95%CI 0.68-1.86) and compared to T6 HR 0.83 (95%CI 0.45-1.52). ER+ patients, T+P showed HR 0.86 (95%CI 0.66-1.13) compared to T12 and HR 0.74 (95%CI 0.49-1.11) to T6. Among ER-, the values were HR 0.76 (95%CI 0.56-1.04) and HR 0.59 (95%CI 0.41-0.85), respectively. In the cost-effectiveness analysis, T+P demonstrated an ICER of $ 332,903 compared to T12, while T12 set side by side of T6 resulted in $ 42,774. In the subgroup N+, T+P presented $ 308,019 when compared to T12. T-DM1 was considered a cost-effective treatment with $ 3,031 compared to T12.
Conclusions
The combination T+P presented an benefit in the subgroup N+, but it was not considered cost-effective. T6 may be considered a therapeutic option in low budget scenarios for patients HR+/N-.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3330 - Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes and BRCA-like status in stage III breast cancer patients treated with intensified carboplatin-based chemotherapy
Presenter: Leonora De Boo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3971 - Unravelling the biological characteristics of MammaPrint extreme risk subgroups
Presenter: Rajith Bhaskaran
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5871 - Residual Cancer burden as a prognostic factor in a large series of Neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Subgroup analysis per molecular surrogated subtypes
Presenter: Catalina Falo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5014 - Clinical validation of CanAssist Breast in a Spanish cohort
Presenter: Manjiri Bakre
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2787 - Meta-analysis on association of pathological complete response with long-term survival outcomes in triple-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Peter A. Fasching
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4301 - Immune infiltrate composition across intrinsic subtypes in hormone receptor (HR)+/HER2- early breast cancer (BC) enrolled in the prospective LETLOB trial
Presenter: Gaia Griguolo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3205 - Frequency of germline mutations in women's cancer susceptibility genes in a large cohort of Chinese breast cancer patients
Presenter: Ning Liao
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4091 - Triple blinded Prospective Study assessing the Impact of Genomics & Artificial Intelligence Watson For Oncology (WFO) on MDT’s Decision of Adjuvant Systemic Therapy for Hormone Receptor Positive Early Breast Carcinoma-
Presenter: Somashekhar Sampige Prasannakumar
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4359 - Prognostic significance of Progesterone Receptor levels in luminal-like Her2- early Breast Cancer patients. A retrospective single Cancer Center analysis.
Presenter: Anna Diana
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1369 - PAM50 HER2-enriched subtype and pathological complete response in HER2-positive early breast cancer: a meta-analysis
Presenter: Francesco Schettini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract