Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
1619 - Meta-analysis of KRAS Mutation as prognostic factor in patients (pts.) with resection of colorectal (CRC) liver metastases: Tumor burden and Sideness analysis.
Presenter: Maria Romina Luca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2104 - Clinical implications of regorafenib-induced hypothyroidism in metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard therapies: A prospective evaluation
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2143 - Clinical impact of BRAF V600E mutations in patients (pts) with resectable solitary colorectal liver metastases (CRLM)
Presenter: Shin Kobayashi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3136 - Trifluridine/tipiracil in metastatic colorectal cancer: an updated multicentre real-world analysis on efficacy, safety and predictive factors.
Presenter: Chara Stavraka
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4234 - Correlation between p53 expression and clinical outcome in RAS/BRAF wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients receiving later-line irinotecan-cetuximab
Presenter: Eleonora Lai
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4287 - Safety and effectiveness of aflibercept + FOLFIRI for the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): OZONE secondary analyses
Presenter: Ian Chau
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1820 - A Phase Ib study of the safety and efficacy of atezolizumab (atezo) + bevacizumab (bev) + cobimetinib (cobi) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC)
Presenter: Johanna Bendell
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5644 - Development and validation of a metastasis-associated immune prognostic model for concurrent metastatic colorectal cancer
Presenter: Zhiwen Luo
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5697 - Prognostic role of blood cell count-based immuno-inflammatory parameters in the Valentino trial
Presenter: Giovanni Fuca
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4704 - Evaluation of safety, immunogenicity and preliminary efficacy of PolyPEPI1018 vaccine in subjects with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with a predictive biomarker
Presenter: Joleen Hubbard
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract