Abstract 5907
Background
The most recent consensus statement on the use of liquid biopsies (circulating tumor DNA – ctDNA testing) has been that it is not yet ready for prime time. However, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is significantly more ‘shedding’ of DNA detectable in blood allowing this test to be of value. We aimed at reporting the concordance of liquid biopsies based on clonality and timing of testing in patients with mCRC.
Methods
A total of 92 mCRC patients were identified who had both a commercially available liquid and tissue next generation sequencing assay done from December 2016 to February 2019. Arbitrarily, mutations were classified as clonal or subclonal based on the 50% cutoff of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF) reported. Concordance rates, including clonal (BRAF-V600E/ RAS), subclonal and amplification concordance were calculated separately for patients for whom the liquid biopsy testing was done before initiation of treatment (n = 27) and after initiation of treatment (n = 65).
Results
Clonal concordance rates were 96.3% for patients when the liquid biopsy was done before initiation of treatment versus 64.6% for patients when the test was obtained after they were already on some systemic therapy (p value: 0.001). Similarly, subclonal and amplification concordance rates for patients in the test before treatment and test after treatment groups are summarized in the table. Moreover, the median of highest VAF% was noted to be 3.1% and 1.1% in test before treatment and test after treatment groups respectively (p value: 0.092).Table:
622P Summary of concordance rates by timing of liquid biopsy test
Test before treatment (N = 27) | Test after treatment (N = 65) | Total (N = 92) | P value | |
---|---|---|---|---|
*Clonal Concordance | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 42: 64.6 (51.8, 76.1) | 68: 73.9 (63.7, 82.5) | 0.001 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 64: 98.5 (91.7, 100.0) | 91: 98.9 (94.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 26: 96.3 (81.0, 99.9) | 52: 80.0 (68.2, 88.9) | 78: 84.8 (75.8, 91.4) | 0.058 |
Subclonal Concordance | 21: 77.8 (57.7, 91.4) | 44: 67.7 (54.9, 78.8) | 65: 70.7 (60.2, 79.7) | 0.452 |
BRAF | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 65: 100.0 (94.5, 100.0) | 92: 100.0 (96.1, 100.0) | 1.000 |
RAS | 27: 100.0 (87.2, 100.0) | 62: 95.4 (87.1, 99.0) | 89: 96.7 (90.8, 99.3) | 0.553 |
Amplification Concordance | 22: 81.5 (61.9, 93.7) | 41: 63.1 (50.2, 74.7) | 63: 68.5 (58.0, 77.8) | 0.092 |
Highest Variant Allele Frequency (VAF)% | 3.1 (0.0, 84.6) | 1.1 (0.0, 90.1) | 1.5 (0.0, 90.1) | 0.092 |
Concordance rates are summarized by count: percent (95% binomial confidence interval). P values arise from Fisher’s exact tests; *Arbitrarily, 50% of the highest variant allele frequency (VAF)% value in the liquid biopsy results has been used to differentiate clonal from subclonal mutations. Highest VAF% is summarized by median (range). P values arise from Wilcoxon rank sum test
Conclusions
Liquid biopsies show a very high concordance rate in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. It is important to take the timing of the assay into consideration alongside relevant clonal mutations while assessing the concordance of liquid biopsies, not just for mCRC but for other malignancies.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
5658 - Detection of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in Circulating-Free DNA for Early Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer
Presenter: Tianyu Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5779 - Detection of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in Circulating-Free DNA for Prediction of The Efficacy of Conversion Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
Presenter: Wenju Chang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4672 - mCRC gene profiling using the Idylla platform
Presenter: Christopher Bricogne
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3393 - PIK3CA mutation in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): association with clinico-pathological features and outcome
Presenter: Valentina Fanotto
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1317 - Patient-Derived Xenografts (PDX) Identifies JMJD6 Inhibitor as an Effective Therapeutic Medicine in Colorectal Cancer.
Presenter: Feng Ye
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1228 - DACH1 induced stemness of intestinal organoids by directly suppressing BMP signaling and contributes to intestinal tumorigenesis
Presenter: Xiang Hu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1147 - miR-148a inhibits early relapsed colorectal cancers and the secretion of VEGF by indirectly targeting HIF-1α under non-hypoxia/hypoxia conditions
Presenter: Hsiang-lin Tsai
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1158 - Long noncoding RNA CASC21 promotes cell proliferation and metastasis in colon cancer.
Presenter: Qun Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1259 - Prognostic and Predictive Impact On FMS-like Tyrosine Kinase 3 (FLT3) Amplification In Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Presenter: Hiroko Hasegawa
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1452 - RBP-Jκ in colon cancer cells facilitates tumor associated macrophages (TAMs)-induced cell metastasis by secreting CXCL11
Presenter: Meng jie Liu
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract